Re: Boost thinks that every C functions are in std::

2003-01-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> | So, when we look for fl_initialize in -lforms, it fails. We | Lars> have to | link against -lforms -lformssnp t

Re: Boost thinks that every C functions are in std::

2003-01-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars> | So, when we look for fl_initialize in -lforms, it fails. We Lars> have to | link against -lforms -lformssnp to make it work. I Lars> attach a patch to | do that. I do no

Re: Boost thinks that every C functions are in std::

2003-01-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | >> But how do we do the xforms autodetection in this case? Configure | >> tells me that it does not find xforms... | | Angus> Sorry, I don't understand. Are you talking about xforms'

Re: Boost thinks that every C functions are in std::

2003-01-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> But how do we do the xforms autodetection in this case? Configure >> tells me that it does not find xforms... Angus> Sorry, I don't understand. Are you talking about xforms' Angus> Imakefile stuff or LyX's configure stuff? LyX configu

Re: Boost thinks that every C functions are in std::

2003-01-21 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> It seems that I am really not able to compile 1.3.0cvs on tru64 >>> unix with cxx. Reasons are: >>> >>> - there is no snprintf in tru64 4.0f, so xforms has to provide its >>> own. the one provided in xforms lib does not compile

Re: Boost thinks that every C functions are in std::

2003-01-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> It seems that I am really not able to compile 1.3.0cvs on tru64 >> unix with cxx. Reasons are: >> >> - there is no snprintf in tru64 4.0f, so xforms has to provide its >> own. the one provided in xfor

Re: Boost thinks that every C functions are in std::

2003-01-21 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > It seems that I am really not able to compile 1.3.0cvs on tru64 unix > with cxx. Reasons are: > > - there is no snprintf in tru64 4.0f, so xforms has to provide its > own. the one provided in xforms lib does not compile on tru64, but > it does after a patch that

Re: Boost thinks that every C functions are in std::

2003-01-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> | On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:03:11PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Lars> | > BUT if boost thinks that all C functions are in std::, why Lars> doesn't gcc | > have problems? fpr

Re: Boost thinks that every C functions are in std::

2003-01-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:03:11PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > BUT if boost thinks that all C functions are in std::, why doesn't gcc | > have problems? fprintf is not in std:: there either... | | Old gcc actively ignores std, i.e. std:: and

Re: Boost thinks that every C functions are in std::

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:03:11PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > BUT if boost thinks that all C functions are in std::, why doesn't gcc > have problems? fprintf is not in std:: there either... Old gcc actively ignores std, i.e. std:: and :: are the same. Andre' -- Those who desire to

Re: Boost thinks that every C functions are in std::

2003-01-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | It seems that I am really not able to compile 1.3.0cvs on tru64 unix | with cxx. Reasons are: | | - there is no snprintf in tru64 4.0f, so xforms has to provide its | own. the one provided in xforms lib does not compile on tru64, but | it doe