Re: Back

2022-05-21 Thread Daniel
On 2022-05-03 17:19, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: Hi, all, Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw from everything else until things settled down. Which they now have. Where are things with

Re: Back

2022-05-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 03/05/2022 à 23:05, Andrew Parsloe a écrit : I've been using Version 2.4.0-alpha3 (Sunday, 14 February 2021) Qt Version (run-time): 5.15.2 Qt Version (compile-time): 5.15.2 Python detected: python -tt that Riki produced earlier in the year on windows 10 for all my work without problems beyo

Re: Back

2022-05-04 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Mittwoch, dem 04.05.2022 um 11:52 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > > There's one (big) question for 2.4: should we include Jürgen's > > latest changes for indices? I'm still working on the XHTML part, > > with a quite large refactoring at the same time to make the code > > (much) easier to

Re: Back

2022-05-04 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Wednesday, 4 May 2022 16.52.32 WEST Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > FWIW, I've been using the master branch for daily work for some time and have > not run into any new major issues. A few small things with line breaking, but > they're hard to reproduce. I think one invovled a quotation mark th

Re: Back

2022-05-04 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 5/4/22 07:47, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 11:19:16AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw from everything else until things settled down

Re: Back

2022-05-04 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 5/3/22 11:27, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: On Tue, 3 May 2022 at 17:19, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: Hi, all, Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw from everything el

Re: Back

2022-05-04 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 11:19:16AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal > circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw from > everything else until things settled down. Which they now have. I'm happy

Re: Back

2022-05-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 03/05/2022 à 17:19, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : Hi, all, Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw from everything else until things settled down. Which they now have. Dear Riki, I am

Re: Back

2022-05-03 Thread Andrew Parsloe
On 4/05/2022 7:55 am, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 11:19:16AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: Hi, all, Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw from everything else until

Re: Back

2022-05-03 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 11:19:16AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Hi, all, > > Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal > circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw from > everything else until things settled down. Which they now ha

Re: Back

2022-05-03 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Tue, 3 May 2022 17:27:52 +0200 schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier : > On Tue, 3 May 2022 at 17:19, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > > Hi, all, > > > > Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal > > circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw > > f

Re: Back

2022-05-03 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Tue, 03 May 2022 17:44:23 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Dienstag, dem 03.05.2022 um 11:19 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly > Heck: > > Hi, all, > > > > Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult > > personal > > circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and jus

Re: Back

2022-05-03 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Dienstag, dem 03.05.2022 um 11:19 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > Hi, all, > > Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult > personal > circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to > withdraw > from everything else until things settled down. Which th

Re: Back

2022-05-03 Thread Thibaut Cuvelier
On Tue, 3 May 2022 at 17:19, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Hi, all, > > Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal > circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw > from everything else until things settled down. Which they now have. > Welco

Re: back to LyX and therefore questions concerning LyX 2.2

2015-10-24 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 06:46:59PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > IMO, a separate hard string freeze is not needed as long as we act > > reasonable. > > I meant it as a part of feature freeze. Whether you are working on > documentation > or translation only, you do

Re: back to LyX and therefore questions concerning LyX 2.2

2015-10-24 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:15:26AM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > >> - Will there be a code-freeze after that strings can still be changed? > > > > > > Is this what is normally done? I'm new at this. > > > > I've actually no clue what is meant with a code freeze afte

Re: back to LyX and therefore questions concerning LyX 2.2

2015-10-24 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 24.10.2015 um 21:49 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Hmm we, as the experts, should not set the bad example. The fact that LyX's docs don't use floats will be used by the unbelievers as an argument against it. The Math manual is the only one where floats are not used. These tables are not a

Re: back to LyX and therefore questions concerning LyX 2.2

2015-10-24 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 24.10.2015 um 22:04 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: I really think that formal tables should be given a very prominent place in the docs. Then we should default to formal border style. We still lack proper support for booktab's \cmidrule: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/3072 regards Uwe

Re: back to LyX and therefore questions concerning LyX 2.2

2015-10-24 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Op 24 okt. 2015 20:42 schreef "Uwe Stöhr" mailto:uwesto...@web.de>>: > But it still doesn't look as good as with \raisebox in my opinion. The header and the line before the header are definitely better, and I would say that the line with the raisebox are too tall. It is subjective of cours

Re: back to LyX and therefore questions concerning LyX 2.2

2015-10-24 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 24 okt. 2015 20:42 schreef "Uwe Stöhr" : > > Am 23.10.2015 um 10:25 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > >> If you look closely, they are not closer than the vertival line over B_V >> is fromthe text. Seriously this is a much bigger problem > > > But it still doesn't look as good as with \raisebox in

Re: back to LyX and therefore questions concerning LyX 2.2

2015-10-24 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 23.10.2015 um 10:25 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: If you look closely, they are not closer than the vertival line over B_V is fromthe text. Seriously this is a much bigger problem But it still doesn't look as good as with \raisebox in my opinion. Besides this, if you prefer formal tables,

Re: back to LyX and therefore questions concerning LyX 2.2

2015-10-23 Thread Pavel Sanda
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > IMO, a separate hard string freeze is not needed as long as we act > reasonable. I meant it as a part of feature freeze. Whether you are working on documentation or translation only, you don't want people mess with UI logic and strings. Pavel

Re: back to LyX and therefore questions concerning LyX 2.2

2015-10-23 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 23-10-2015 om 9:15 schreef Pavel Sanda: So back to Uwe's question, it would be good you announce at some point - features won't change ( except of bugfixing ) - translatable strings are not going to be changed (except obvious bugs/typos). and maybe give some hint when this might occur :) I

Re: back to LyX and therefore questions concerning LyX 2.2

2015-10-23 Thread Uwe Stöhr
  Original Message   From: Scott Kostyshak Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2015 18:45‎ > Uwe, can you explain‎ why it is useful to have the beta released before starting to work on the documentation? Why not start right after the feature freeze? I need fixed strings. In my experience string change

Re: back to LyX and therefore questions concerning LyX 2.2

2015-10-23 Thread Uwe Stöhr
  Original Message   From: Scott Kostyshak Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2015 18:45‎ ‎ On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:55:05AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:33:43PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > >> Dear LyXers,

Re: back to LyX and therefore questions concerning LyX 2.2

2015-10-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 23/10/2015 02:57, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : I had now a look and the formal tables doesn't solve the spacing problems: The "V" of the underscript/subscript are too close. If you look closely, they are not closer than the vertival line over B_V is fromthe text. Seriously this is a much bigger prob

Re: back to LyX and therefore questions concerning LyX 2.2

2015-10-23 Thread Pavel Sanda
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > >> - Will there be a code-freeze after that strings can still be changed? > > > > Is this what is normally done? I'm new at this. > > I've actually no clue what is meant with a code freeze after that > strings an be changed ? I think the question was, whether the f

Re: back to LyX and therefore questions concerning LyX 2.2

2015-10-22 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 21.10.2015 um 12:06 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: What do you mean? Apparently I missed your mail too. Sorry, I should have given the references: https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg183726.html Hi JMarc, I had now a look and the formal tables doesn't solve the spacing

Re: back to LyX and therefore questions concerning LyX 2.2

2015-10-22 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:55:05AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:33:43PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > >> Dear LyXers, > >> > >> I would like to have a beta release short after the feature-freeze. > >> Duri

Re: back to LyX and therefore questions concerning LyX 2.2

2015-10-21 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:33:43PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> Dear LyXers, >> >> I would like to have a beta release short after the feature-freeze. >> During the beta and RC-cycle the docs will be updated because this >> usually takes some

Re: back to LyX and therefore questions concerning LyX 2.2

2015-10-21 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:33:43PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Dear LyXers, > > I would like to have a beta release short after the feature-freeze. > During the beta and RC-cycle the docs will be updated because this > usually takes some weeks. Sounds good to me. > > - Will there be a code-freeze

Re: back to LyX and therefore questions concerning LyX 2.2

2015-10-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 20/10/2015 23:16, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Am 19.10.2015 um 16:42 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: PS: and of course my idea of replacing ugly tables with nice formal tables and remove all the spacing hacks you had to do is still waiting for your answer ;) What do you mean? Apparently I missed your

Re: back to LyX and therefore questions concerning LyX 2.2

2015-10-20 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 19.10.2015 um 16:42 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Welcome back! Thanks JMarc for the info. PS: and of course my idea of replacing ugly tables with nice formal tables and remove all the spacing hacks you had to do is still waiting for your answer ;) What do you mean? Apparently I missed

Re: back to LyX and therefore questions concerning LyX 2.2

2015-10-19 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 19/10/15 16:33, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : - what is the timetable for LyX 2.2? Maybe an alpha release next week. - Will there be a code-freeze after that strings can still be changed? Don't know - Who is the release manager for 2.2 Scott. - A request: could anybody please add all new fea

Re: back from vacation

2013-10-21 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 07.09.2013 10:38, schrieb Pavel Sanda: will not have much time until the German election September 22. Uwe, what will happen with LyX if you win? I did not seek for election in the federal elections, I only helped others to win. After that I tried to get elected to a position in my part

Re: back from vacation

2013-09-08 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 6-9-2013 22:50, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Dear clooeagues, sorry for my silence. I am now back but will not have much time until the German election September 22. I try to commit the docs stuff I received and also the po-files. Anything I need to know, deadlines etc.? I'm now wrapping up to pre

Re: back from vacation

2013-09-07 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Sounds good. Should we switch the default UI language to de_DE before beta 2 is out then? Pavel Sorry, I don't like this kind of last-minute changes. Can you postpone this patch till after beta 2? Vincent

Re: back from vacation

2013-09-07 Thread Pavel Sanda
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > will not have much time until the > > > German election September 22. > > > > Uwe, what will happen with LyX if you win? > > Well. of course Uwe will force every German citizen to use LyX. And we will > get some more funding. Sounds good. Sh

Re: back from vacation

2013-09-07 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Pavel Sanda wrote: > > will not have much time until the > > German election September 22. > > Uwe, what will happen with LyX if you win? Well. of course Uwe will force every German citizen to use LyX. And we will get some more funding. Uwe, you have my vote! Jürgen

Re: back from vacation

2013-09-07 Thread Pavel Sanda
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > will not have much time until the > German election September 22. Uwe, what will happen with LyX if you win? Pavel

Re: back from vacation

2013-09-06 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Dear clooeagues, > > sorry for my silence. I am now back but will not have much time until the > German election September 22. > I try to commit the docs stuff I received and also the po-files. > > Anything I need to know, deadlines etc.? > > many

Re: Back to svn

2008-07-13 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
José Matos wrote: Hello all, I have composed new tarballs that only differ from last Friday's in the documentation and translations updates. I have update the files in the usual place in home area. I have also placed a copy in ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel That means that commits are a

Re: back to work

2007-08-25 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Richard Heck wrote: > You've probably seen the list Martin put together. If not, it's in the > archives. Yes. Jürgen

Re: back to work

2007-08-25 Thread Richard Heck
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: As you might have noted, my holidays are over :-( I just went through almost 2000 messages from the last 3 weeks and I still have to go through the commit logs. I have marked things that look relevant to branch and I will return to them bit by bit. Please be patient,

Re: Back - kindo

2007-01-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > I am wiggling back. | > | | Welcome back! Are you OK? Quite ok, just needed a break. -- Lgb

Re: Back - kindo

2007-01-11 Thread Georg Baum
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I am wiggling back. Great! We were missing you. Georg

Re: Back - kindo

2007-01-11 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: I am wiggling back. Welcome back! Are you OK? Abdel.

Re: Back to basics.

2005-10-12 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Jose'> It is a shame that Angus work has been lost. :-( > Yes... That'll learn me not to commit to a repository :( The work got lost when Lars kicked me off baywatch and I didn't think before `rm -r ~/public_html/www-user` ... -- Angus

Re: Back to basics.

2005-10-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jose'> On Wednesday 12 October 2005 11:25, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> What about posting this on the news section of www.lyx.org? Jose'> I don't have write cvs access to the www-users module. :-) Lars? Jose'> It is quite interest

Re: Back to basics.

2005-10-12 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 12 October 2005 11:25, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > What about posting this on the news section of www.lyx.org? I don't have write cvs access to the www-users module. :-) It is quite interesting to add, as well as converting the archaeology to the site. :-) It is a shame t

Re: Back to basics.

2005-10-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jose'> Lets us say no more, let us abandon 1.4, no need to Jose'> have such release. Soon celebrating the 10 years of the first Jose'> still available source code in the lyx ftp site I propose a new Jose'> path. What about posting t

Re: Back to basics.

2005-10-12 Thread Jose' Matos
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 01:36, Luis Rivera wrote: > > It DOES run on cygwin! > > Cute to see lil' LyX, like seeing baby pictures in an album! > > I wonder how did it grow so big! ;-) > > Anyway, good experiment for after lunch... :-) Notice that there is a bug there. For some reason the ve

Re: Back to basics.

2005-10-10 Thread Luis Rivera
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Luis Rivera wrote: > > I want to give it a shot at compiling this piece of archaeology. > >... Can you tell me where to download the source code > > for xforms? > > http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/xforms/xforms-1.0.90.tar.gz > > > Do you thin

Re: Back to basics.

2005-10-10 Thread Jose' Matos
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > But I was not there. OK. > And my name is not spelt like that. Release often, release earlier... ;-) Fixed, thank you. :-) > JMarc -- José Matos

Re: Back to basics.

2005-10-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Asger" == Asger Ottar Alstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Asger> Jose' Matos wrote: >> PS: For those wanting to know how many lyx development meetings >> there were, here it follows a small hint: >> http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/archaeology/ldm-info.txt Corrections to >> this list are appreci

Re: Back to basics.

2005-10-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Asger Ottar Alstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Jose' Matos wrote: | > PS: For those wanting to know how many lyx development meetings | > there were, here it follows a small hint: | > http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/archaeology/ldm-info.txt | > Corrections to this list are appreciat

Re: Back to basics.

2005-10-09 Thread Jose' Matos
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote: > Jose' Matos wrote: >> PS: For those wanting to know how many lyx development meetings >> there were, >> here it follows a small hint: >> http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/archaeology/ldm-info.txt >> >> Corrections to this list are appreciated, thanks. > > G

Re: Back to basics.

2005-10-09 Thread Asger Ottar Alstrup
Jose' Matos wrote: PS: For those wanting to know how many lyx development meetings there were, here it follows a small hint: http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/archaeology/ldm-info.txt Corrections to this list are appreciated, thanks. Great job! Jürgen was definately in Copenhagen

Re: Back to basics.

2005-10-08 Thread Angus Leeming
Luis Rivera wrote: > I want to give it a shot at compiling this piece of archaeology. (I'm a > Medieval scholar ;-) Can you tell me where to download the source code > for xforms? http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/xforms/xforms-1.0.90.tar.gz > Do you think it will run on Windoze? It might

Re: Back to basics.

2005-10-08 Thread Luis Rivera
Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hello, > in the last 10 years LyX has become a bloated program, lots of code, > a huge > time required to compile it (unless you can do it in a 4 or 8-way Opteron). > > Lets us say no more, let us abandon 1.4, no need to have such > re

Re: Back to life

2002-03-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> holiday is over... Andre' Welcome back. There are a few messages and patches waiting for you :) JMarc

Re: Back to the future (1.1.6fix4, status update #1)

2001-10-22 Thread adrien . rebollo
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 06:20:37PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "adrien" == adrien rebollo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > adrien> I have backported the patches to handle latin3, 4 and 9 to the > adrien> 1.1.6 branch. I'm sending the patch. It should not disturb > adrien> much. > >

Re: Back to the future (1.1.6fix4, status update #1)

2001-10-22 Thread adrien . rebollo
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 06:20:37PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "adrien" == adrien rebollo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > adrien> I have backported the patches to handle latin3, 4 and 9 to the > adrien> 1.1.6 branch. I'm sending the patch. It should not disturb > adrien> much. > >

Re: Back to the future (1.1.6fix4, status update #1)

2001-10-22 Thread adrien . rebollo
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 11:36:18AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Hello, > > I think that a 1.1.6fix4 release _might_ be useful, especially since I > backported the selection bugfix from 1.2.0 (could somebody confirm > that it works?). Are there some other things that should go in > 1.1.

Re: Back to the future (1.1.6fix4, status update #1)

2001-10-18 Thread leif halvard silli
Allan and Jean-Marc wrote: >On 16 Oct 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> Hello, > >Hello! > >> I think that a 1.1.6fix4 release _might_ be useful, especially since I >> backported the selection bugfix from 1.2.0 (could somebody confirm >> that it works?). Are there some other things that shoul

Re: back with the matrix dialog

1999-01-08 Thread Andre' Poenitz
> The code is not the same, was written by different people at different > times and does not have the same features. Does that answer your > question? ;) No ;-) It was merely a 'leading question' hoping to see one day the same dialog in both places. > *Maybe* will it be possible in LyX 1.1 to

Re: back with the matrix dialog

1999-01-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre'" == Andre' Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Andre'> I'd prefer exactly the same dialog for matrices as for >> tables. Andre'> Probably because I've never understood the >> conceptional Andre'> difference between matrices and tables... >> >> There is no conceptual difference

Re: back with the matrix dialog

1999-01-08 Thread Andre' Poenitz
> Andre'> I'd prefer exactly the same dialog for matrices as for tables. > Andre'> Probably because I've never understood the conceptional > Andre'> difference between matrices and tables... > > There is no conceptual difference as far as LaTeX is > concerned. However, the LyX implementations are

Re: back with the matrix dialog

1999-01-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre'" == Andre' Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Hmm, I do not have any special thought about it. What do you >> people prefer? The old one with horizontal sliders or Emmanuel's >> version with a vertical rows slider? In any case, we should use >> similar solutions for the table a

Re: back with the matrix dialog

1999-01-08 Thread Andre' Poenitz
> > > "Emmanuel" == Emmanuel GUREGHIAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Emmanuel> After making up my mind, I have tried to change the matrix > Emmanuel> dialog in math_forms.fd in such a way that size does not > Emmanuel> change. The side effect is that buttons are now on the > Emmanuel> righ

Re: back with the matrix dialog

1999-01-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Emmanuel" == Emmanuel GUREGHIAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Emmanuel> After making up my mind, I have tried to change the matrix Emmanuel> dialog in math_forms.fd in such a way that size does not Emmanuel> change. The side effect is that buttons are now on the Emmanuel> right. Hmm, I do n