Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 12:11:06PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> > > How do you get "The IP-address" of some machine?
> > > This logic is flawed.
> >
> > You need the IP-address of your own machine to
>
> My machine can have any number of IP adresses, including 0, 1, and
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 12:11:06PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> > How do you get "The IP-address" of some machine?
> > This logic is flawed.
>
> You need the IP-address of your own machine to
My machine can have any number of IP adresses, including 0, 1, and 42.
So which is the "right" one?
> I
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 11:50:33AM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> > 1. Create the symlink on startup, use IP-Addr:Processnumber
>
> How do you get "The IP-address" of some machine?
> This logic is flawed.
You need the IP-address of your own machine to
compare with the IP
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 11:50:33AM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> 1. Create the symlink on startup, use IP-Addr:Processnumber
How do you get "The IP-address" of some machine?
This logic is flawed.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 18-Oct-2001 Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
>
> > On startup lyx could check if another lyx process of the same user was running
> > and if not it could just delete the lypipe.
>
> This would be a good idea, the problem is how to detect in a "portable"
> way that the
On 18-Oct-2001 Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> On startup lyx could check if another lyx process of the same user was running
> and if not it could just delete the lypipe.
This would be a good idea, the problem is how to detect in a "portable"
way that the user is running another lyx process.
On 18-Oct-2001 John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 04:45:17PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
>> The problem seems to be that calling ::abort in support/abort.C prevents
>> the LyX server's (and a few more) destructors from running.
>>
>> I'd just throw some uncaught exception, but than L
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 06:24:28PM +0200, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 03:21:02PM +0200, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> >> I have to support some less clueful windows user who switched to lkinux
> >> be
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 04:45:17PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> The problem seems to be that calling ::abort in support/abort.C prevents
> the LyX server's (and a few more) destructors from running.
>
> I'd just throw some uncaught exception, but than LyX does not want to use
> exceptions at al
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 03:21:02PM +0200, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
>> I have to support some less clueful windows user who switched to lkinux
>> because of me and stuff like this is a nightmare. ("Simple, just type ALT
>> + F2 k
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 04:45:17PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 03:21:02PM +0200, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
>> Would be cool if an (integrated non hacky) solution would pop up for
>> lyx-1.1.6fix4 or lyx-1.2 (whenever it is ready)
>
>The problem seems to be that callin
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 03:21:02PM +0200, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> Would be cool if an (integrated non hacky) solution would pop up for
> lyx-1.1.6fix4 or lyx-1.2 (whenever it is ready)
The problem seems to be that calling ::abort in support/abort.C prevents
the LyX server's (and a few mo
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 03:21:02PM +0200, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> I have to support some less clueful windows user who switched to lkinux
> because of me and stuff like this is a nightmare. ("Simple, just type ALT
> + F2 konsole [Enter] then rm ~/.lyx/lyxpipe.* After this restart lyx and
13 matches
Mail list logo
