On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 07:54:43AM -0300, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> This is "only" a matter of defining a new command, for example
>
> M-x brace-group
I'll promise to think about it once I get my own pet LFUN_MATH. I don't
want to pollute the global LFUN namespace with this kind of spec
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 10:51:10AM +, John Levon wrote:
> (of course I'm just being a pain here ...)
Yes.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> There are quite a few reasons for that, apart from the coders being more
> able than me
I wouldn't say this about you...
> So until someone shows _real_
> interest (a patch e.g. ;-)) in getting this changed I won't attempt it.
...but I definitely
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 11:11:26AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Yes, but from a philosophical point of view, everything LyX does (at least
> at some point of time) is LaTeX. It's just somewhat hidden in most cases.
philosophically, do we never want to support MAthML embedded in DocBook,
for exa
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 06:42:14AM -0300, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Math _is_ ERT. More or less.
>
> I don't understand this. Not that I'm trying to understand it tecnicaly,
> I'm just trying to figure out the philosophy here, since I consid
Sorry for going back to lyx-devel, Andre'! Maybe this post fits better
here than in lyx-users. And thank you for answering my questions here and
in lyx-users.
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Math _is_ ERT. More or less.
I don't understand this. Not that I'm trying to understand it
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 09:11:38PM -0300, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> I was wondering what is the purpose of binding { to (literal) {} in math
> mode. In text mode, we have the following bindings
>
> { -> \{
> } -> \}
>
> which seem natural to math mode too. Is this a bug or a feature tha
