Richard Heck wrote:
> Looks good to me.
thanks for comments.
pavel
On 03/26/2010 02:12 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
wouldnt be better this way
// Saving failed, so backup is not backup
if (madeBackup)
backupName.moveTo(d->filename);
+d->filename.copyTo(d->backupName);
Richard Heck wrote:
>> wouldnt be better this way
>> // Saving failed, so backup is not backup
>> if (madeBackup)
>> backupName.moveTo(d->filename);
>> +d->filename.copyTo(d->backupName);
>>
>>
>>
> I'm a bit puzzled here. Why c
On 03/25/2010 08:07 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
hi,
this is not fixing the root of #6587 but at least we add some
safety measures. since its touching sensitive area of code,
i'd like to ask for review before committing.
I read the thread on the bug. This is weird and annoying. From what I
can t
