On 01/05/13 05:58, PhilipPirrip wrote:
> how many ordinary users do you think will use layout editing feature?
I wish I had one (cls/sty) for my MSc and PhD thesis, and a few technical
reports. Though, the features I really needed were very M$-ish (customize
front-page, customize header and footer
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 6:58 AM, PhilipPirrip wrote:
> On 04/30/2013 10:18 PM, Cyrille Artho wrote:
>>
>> You are right that poorly designed/edited layout files offer a user many
>> ways to shoot him/herself into the foot.
>
>
>
> I know I will not convince you, still... how many ordinary users do
On 01/05/13 05:58, PhilipPirrip wrote:
> I don't think layout editor can come much farther than presenting us with a
> list of keyword/value pairs.
Let's say, I'm not concerned about how to edit the layout information. I just
said visually edit because
for trivial things that many non-professio
On 04/30/2013 10:18 PM, Cyrille Artho wrote:
You are right that poorly designed/edited layout files offer a user many
ways to shoot him/herself into the foot.
I know I will not convince you, still... how many ordinary users do you
think will use layout editing feature? Layout files are not th
Hi Philip,
You are right that poorly designed/edited layout files offer a user many
ways to shoot him/herself into the foot.
However, this does not eliminate the need for layout files, and the demand
for an easy way to edit them. Of course, any ideas how to avoid or mitigate
problematic layou
On 04/30/2013 05:10 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Something like I edit the page visually and/or editing params,
and I get a .cls file, as well as a .layout file to be used
within LyX, that uses the .cls file.
Saying that, do you consider cls (sty?) files that only define \big as
"bold, italic
