Bo Peng wrote:
Well, let us start from the beginning. Hopefully at a level of design. :-)
But I first would like to point out that designs dictate
implementations. If I do not introduce a bundled mode, I can not use a
zip format. I can not switch a file to binary format just because I
insert an
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Here's what we DO need to debate: (i) Whether we should distinguish
between bundling and wrapping, as JMarc long ago urged we should;
To elaborate on this point, we could try to set things up so that the
normal use of a b
rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's what we DO need to debate: (i) Whether we should distinguish
> between bundling and wrapping, as JMarc long ago urged we should;
To elaborate on this point, we could try to set things up so that the
normal use of a bundled file is a plain binary file (
Well, let us start from the beginning. Hopefully at a level of design. :-)
But I first would like to point out that designs dictate
implementations. If I do not introduce a bundled mode, I can not use a
zip format. I can not switch a file to binary format just because I
insert an embedded inset. A
Bo Peng wrote:
I'm trying to concentrate on very general questions
about how these two proposals work. The question, "Do you use zip or tar or
base64?" is just not worth discussing at this point. ...
Richard,
We are both tired of this discussion. My proposal is solid. I can
provide every
