Re: 2.4.1

2024-07-05 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 7/5/24 11:23 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Donnerstag, dem 04.07.2024 um 00:01 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: I guess we should just limit the number of authors that we parse. Done that as well in master now (7d2d26132b6bb28). This helps a lot with the remaining performance problems

Re: 2.4.1

2024-07-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Donnerstag, dem 04.07.2024 um 00:01 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > I guess we should just limit the number of authors that we parse. Done that as well in master now (7d2d26132b6bb28). This helps a lot with the remaining performance problems of that particular file. Possible candidate f

Re: 2.4.1

2024-07-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 05/07/2024 à 14:10, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Am Donnerstag, dem 04.07.2024 um 17:12 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: From what I understand, it exhausts the memory of the computer by allocating memory somewhere in the regex machinery (see the backtrace in the report). So the problem i

Re: 2.4.1

2024-07-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Donnerstag, dem 04.07.2024 um 17:12 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > From what I understand, it exhausts the memory of the computer by > allocating memory somewhere in the regex machinery (see the backtrace > in the report). So the problem is not just about caching. Regex indeed was the m

Re: 2.4.1 OT

2024-07-05 Thread Dr Eberhard Lisse
On 2024/07/04 20:57, José Matos wrote: > On Thu, 2024-07-04 at 20:28 +0200, Eberhard W Lisse wrote: >> The quality of papers is usually inversely proportionate to the >> number of authors. > > Tell that to particle physicists. :-D Put they don't have to add every particle to the author list :-)-

Re: 2.4.1 OT

2024-07-04 Thread José Matos
On Thu, 2024-07-04 at 20:28 +0200, Eberhard W Lisse wrote: > The quality of papers is usually inversely proportionate to the > number of authors. Tell that to particle physicists. :-D -- José Abílio -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-deve

Re: 2.4.1 OT

2024-07-04 Thread Eberhard W Lisse
On 04/07/2024 01:02, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: [...] > Will do. We had another bug like this when some physicist was > referencing a paper with 3000 authors or something. [...] ROTFLPIMPHMSBAH :-)-O The quality of papers is usually inversely proportionate to the number of authors. el -- lyx

Re: 2.4.1

2024-07-04 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Donnerstag, dem 04.07.2024 um 17:12 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > > I suppose caching this vector and only recreating it when necessary > > will make the case in the bug report usable again (the long list > > causes > > a noticeable delay, but it's bearable if done once IMHO), and it > >

Re: 2.4.1

2024-07-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 04/07/2024 à 16:42, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : I think the problem is that we call getAuthors() for one and the same reference way too often by calling BibTeXInfo::getAuthorList() from diverse places (which is at least in parts also my fault, see BibTeXInfo::getValueForKey()). Every time we

Re: 2.4.1

2024-07-04 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Mittwoch, dem 03.07.2024 um 19:02 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > > Could you take a look at it now? I do not understand at all this > > bibio.cpp stuff to fetch author names. I guess we should just limit > > the number of authors that we parse. > > Will do. We had another bug like this

Re: 2.4.1

2024-07-03 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 7/3/24 6:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 24/06/2024 à 22:26, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : On 6/24/24 1:20 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 09/06/2024 à 19:18, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : We do not seem to have had any panicked reports of crashes. Yea! So I propose to merge 2.

Re: 2.4.1

2024-07-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 24/06/2024 à 22:26, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : On 6/24/24 1:20 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 09/06/2024 à 19:18, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : We do not seem to have had any panicked reports of crashes. Yea! So I propose to merge 2.4.1-devel into 2.4.x and plan to release 2.4.1 a

Re: 2.4.1 Rebuilt

2024-07-03 Thread Jean-Pierre Chrétien
Le 02/07/2024 à 21:36, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : Rebuilt tarballs, with a few more fixes (one crash), are here: http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ We have had no other reports of problems, so please build binaries. Works fine on Debian stable. I forgot a shortcut conflict, it wil

Re: 2.4.1 Rebuilt

2024-07-02 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 7/2/24 7:11 PM, José Matos wrote: On Tue, 2024-07-02 at 15:36 -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: Rebuilt tarballs, with a few more fixes (one crash), are here: http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ We have had no other reports of problems, so please build binaries. Riki Just as befor

Re: 2.4.1 Rebuilt

2024-07-02 Thread José Matos
On Tue, 2024-07-02 at 15:36 -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Rebuilt tarballs, with a few more fixes (one crash), are here: > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ > > We have had no other reports of problems, so please build binaries. > > Riki Just as before I rebuild it in the lyx-

Re: 2.4.1 Tarballs

2024-07-02 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 08:43:15PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > It might be worth waiting a day to build binaries, just in case anything > comes up. Seems ok on debian stable. P -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: 2.4.1 Tarballs

2024-07-02 Thread José Matos
On Mon, 2024-07-01 at 20:43 -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Here: > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/ > > It might be worth waiting a day to build binaries, just in case > anything > comes up. > > Riki Built it for Fedora: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jamatos/lyx-nex

Re: 2.4.1

2024-06-24 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 6/24/24 1:20 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 09/06/2024 à 19:18, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : We do not seem to have had any panicked reports of crashes. Yea! So I propose to merge 2.4.1-devel into 2.4.x and plan to release 2.4.1 at the end of the month. We have quite a few fixes alrea

Re: 2.4.1

2024-06-24 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 09/06/2024 à 19:18, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : We do not seem to have had any panicked reports of crashes. Yea! So I propose to merge 2.4.1-devel into 2.4.x and plan to release 2.4.1 at the end of the month. We have quite a few fixes already in the pipeline. OK? Otherwise, I'm going to

Re: 2.4.1

2024-06-10 Thread José Matos
On Sun, 2024-06-09 at 13:18 -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > We do not seem to have had any panicked reports of crashes. Yea! So I > propose to merge 2.4.1-devel into 2.4.x and plan to release 2.4.1 at > the > end of the month. We have quite a few fixes already in the pipeline. > OK? +100 :-

Re: 2.4.1

2024-06-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 09/06/2024 à 19:18, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : We do not seem to have had any panicked reports of crashes. Yea! So I propose to merge 2.4.1-devel into 2.4.x and plan to release 2.4.1 at the end of the month. We have quite a few fixes already in the pipeline. OK? That would be great.