On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:33:52 +0200
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:48:24 +0100
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > But I also think URL should show up in the Custom menu, and Strong in
> >
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:48:24 +0100
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > But I also think URL should show up in the Custom menu, and Strong in
> > the Charstyles.
>
> I am not sure that it is interesting for the user to know that URL i
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
But I also think URL should show up in the Custom menu, and Strong in
the Charstyles.
I am not sure that it is interesting for the user to know that URL is
a custom inset? What does it mean to him. A Character Styl
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But I also think URL should show up in the Custom menu, and Strong in
> the Charstyles.
I am not sure that it is interesting for the user to know that URL is
a custom inset? What does it mean to him. A Character Style is
something clear, but I do not t
...
> With 1.6, it seems like the writer not only need to set the type of
> a new document, but also pick a selection of modules. This is the
> problem, one must pick the modules before they are useable.
> That makes sense for specialized stuff, but "strong" and "URL"
> is generic stuff that lots
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 12:19:39PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
But I can't make more URL's, except by copy+pasting the existing ones.
Edit->charstyle offers "code" and such from "logical markup",
URL is not offered.
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
I opened an old document with yesterdays 1.6svn.
Old URL insets were converted to URL charstyle - nice.
But I can't make more URL's, except by copy+pasting the existing ones.
Edit->charstyle offers "code" and such from "logical markup",
URL is not offer
Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> Eh, shouldn't URL rather be in stdinsets? If it's a standard
>> feature...
>>
> That'd be fine with me. Should the URL module then be removed
> altogether? If so, then I guess the lyx2lyx would need to be changed,
> as well.
Y
Martin Vermeer wrote:
Eh, shouldn't URL rather be in stdinsets? If it's a standard
feature...
That'd be fine with me. Should the URL module then be removed
altogether? If so, then I guess the lyx2lyx would need to be changed, as
well.
Richard
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 12:19:39PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
> Dov Feldstern wrote:
> > Helge Hafting wrote:
> >> But I can't make more URL's, except by copy+pasting the existing ones.
> >> Edit->charstyle offers "code" and such from "logical markup",
> >> URL is not offered.
> >>
> >
> > URL is
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
But I can't make more URL's, except by copy+pasting the existing ones.
Edit->charstyle offers "code" and such from "logical markup",
URL is not offered.
URL is in a separate module (not in logical markup). I'm not sure why
this is, though...
If it
Helge Hafting wrote:
I opened an old document with yesterdays 1.6svn.
Old URL insets were converted to URL charstyle - nice.
But I can't make more URL's, except by copy+pasting the existing ones.
Edit->charstyle offers "code" and such from "logical markup",
URL is not offered.
URL is in a se
12 matches
Mail list logo
