Michael Gerz wrote:
> IOW we should move from dvipdfm to dvipdfmx?
This is already done.
If dvipdfmx is installed, LyX uses that. Else, it falls back to dvipdfm.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller schrieb:
Herbert Voss wrote:
-> XeTeX
So dvipdfmx is still the right thing to choose, unless people use XeTeX (where
they currently need to change the converters manually anyway).
Jürgen
IOW we should move from dvipdfm to dvipdfmx?
Michael
On Saturday 26 May 2007 17:33:48 Herbert Voss wrote:
> I never used it but I suppose, that using xdvipdfmx doesn't hurt, it
> does the same and it can handle unicode.
Is that a viewer or a converter?
> Herbert
--
José Abílio
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Herbert Voss wrote:
>> -> XeTeX
>
> So dvipdfmx is still the right thing to choose, unless people use XeTeX
> (where
> they currently need to change the converters manually anyway).
I never used it but I suppose, that using xdvipdfmx doesn't hurt, it
does the same an
Herbert Voss wrote:
> -> XeTeX
So dvipdfmx is still the right thing to choose, unless people use XeTeX (where
they currently need to change the converters manually anyway).
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Herbert Voss wrote:
>>> dvipdfmx is neither useless nor outdated:
>>> http://project.ktug.or.kr/dvipdfmx/
>> dvipdfm is useless ...
>
> But we use dvipdfmx (if available).
>
>> there is also a xdvipdfmx
>
> what's its benefit?
-> XeTeX
Herbert
Herbert Voss wrote:
> > dvipdfmx is neither useless nor outdated:
> > http://project.ktug.or.kr/dvipdfmx/
>
> dvipdfm is useless ...
But we use dvipdfmx (if available).
> there is also a xdvipdfmx
what's its benefit?
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Michael Gerz wrote:
>> I wonder whether we should drop the dvipdfm path for 1.5.X. Is anybody
>> actually using this (possibly outdated) tool? Offering tree ways to
>> generate PDF may cause more confusion than it brings benefits.
>
> No.
> dvipdfmx is neither useless n
Michael Gerz wrote:
> I wonder whether we should drop the dvipdfm path for 1.5.X. Is anybody
> actually using this (possibly outdated) tool? Offering tree ways to
> generate PDF may cause more confusion than it brings benefits.
No.
dvipdfmx is neither useless nor outdated:
http://project.ktug.or.k
Neal Becker schrieb:
Oh, I did get an answer. Unfortunately, I can't seem to find the message
right now, but the answer is, that I need to make that agr->pdf instead of
agr->pdf2.
There was also a discussion that the use of pdf{,2,3} was really a broken
design.
I wonder whether we shoul
Neal Becker wrote:
> Oh, I did get an answer. Unfortunately, I can't seem to find the message
> right now, but the answer is, that I need to make that agr->pdf instead of
> agr->pdf2.
>
> There was also a discussion that the use of pdf{,2,3} was really a broken
> design.
>
It is confusing, b
On Tuesday 22 May 2007, you wrote:
> Neal Becker schrieb:
> > lyx-1.5b3. I added:
> > \converter "agr" "pdf2" "gracebat -hardcopy -printfile $$o -hdevice PDF
> > $$i 2>/dev/null" ""
> >
> > But it's not being used when I choose 'view pdflatex'. Instead, I get:
> >
> > An error occurred whilst run
Neal Becker schrieb:
lyx-1.5b3. I added:
\converter "agr" "pdf2" "gracebat -hardcopy -printfile $$o -hdevice PDF $$i 2>/dev/null"
""
But it's not being used when I choose 'view pdflatex'. Instead, I get:
An error occurred whilst running epstopdf
--outfile='6_home_nbecker_shannon2_hg_8ps
ERR
José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 18 May 2007 11:45:16 am Neal Becker wrote:
>> lyx-1.5b3. I added:
>> \converter "agr" "pdf2" "gracebat -hardcopy -printfile $$o -hdevice PDF
>> $$i 2>/dev/null" ""
>>
>> But it's not being used when I choose 'view pdflatex'. Instead, I get:
>>
>> How do I convince l
On Friday 18 May 2007 11:45:16 am Neal Becker wrote:
> lyx-1.5b3. I added:
> \converter "agr" "pdf2" "gracebat -hardcopy -printfile $$o -hdevice PDF $$i
> 2>/dev/null" ""
>
> But it's not being used when I choose 'view pdflatex'. Instead, I get:
>
> How do I convince lyx to use agr->pdf2 instead
15 matches
Mail list logo
