On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 04:57:23PM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> No. AFAIK the latest GNU ld from binutils 2.12 unfortunately can't
> be built on Tru64 Unix 4.0D ("not supported on this platform").
Still the case with 2.12.1 ? What about an older release ?
john
--
"SirCam: Hi! How are you? Eli
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> You have not tried to use the gnu linker?
No. AFAIK the latest GNU ld from binutils 2.12 unfortunately can't
be built on Tru64 Unix 4.0D ("not supported on this platform").
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hahn-Meitner-Institut Berlin, Germany
On Wednesday 15 May 2002 12:45 pm, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> >>1) Tru64 Unix 4.0D on Alpha w/ gcc 2.95.3:
>
> [...]
>
> >>DepTable.C:76: implicit declaration of function `int time(...)'
> >
> > #include
>
> This fixed it and now only the final linking of the lyx executable
> f
Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Angus Leeming wrote:
>>>1) Tru64 Unix 4.0D on Alpha w/ gcc 2.95.3:
| [...]
>>>DepTable.C:76: implicit declaration of function `int time(...)'
>> #include
>
| This fixed it and now only the final linking of the lyx executable
| fails with a lot of unres
Angus Leeming wrote:
>>1) Tru64 Unix 4.0D on Alpha w/ gcc 2.95.3:
[...]
>>DepTable.C:76: implicit declaration of function `int time(...)'
>
> #include
This fixed it and now only the final linking of the lyx executable
fails with a lot of unresolved symbols. After explicitly linking
with libstdc
On Tuesday 14 May 2002 3:28 pm, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Hello,
>
> good news first: compilation of LyX 1.2.0pre5 works fine
> on Solaris (Sparc) 2.6 w/ gcc 3.0.4. Thanks for that.
> For a wider audience, 1.2.0pre5 should also be added to
> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/ , shouldn't it?
>
> Now fo
