Martin wrote:
> Sure, but keep it in mind to avoid double work.
cleaning up of the tabular code has to be done anyway
and i have troubles enough to wrap my head around this tabular stuff crashing
on me
sigh
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:21:13 +0200
"Leuven, E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also, I think there's a lot of code sharing that can be done between
> > math tables and tabular. See our discussion about cell access methods to
> > Inset earlier last week (with JMarc and Alfredo).
>
> let' s worry
> Also, I think there's a lot of code sharing that can be done between
> math tables and tabular. See our discussion about cell access methods to
> Inset earlier last week (with JMarc and Alfredo).
let' s worry about that later (when the tabular code is cleaner)
Leuven, E. wrote:
> Georg Baum wrote:
>> Another one is the "single
>> cell multicolumn" problem: The fact that you need \multicolumn if you
>> want to change the alignment or border of just one cell is a LaTeX
>> implementation issue, and the user should not need to know that. LyX
>> should creat
Georg Baum wrote:
> I don't think so. In general the tabular code is far too close to LaTeX
> IMHO, and this is just one case where it shows.
i am glad you say so, it is exactly the feeling i have after staring at the
code for some time now...
> Another one is the "single
> cell multicolumn" pro
On 8/21/07, Leuven, E. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alfredo wrote:
> > What happends when you insert a new row, does its cells inherit
> column/row
> > attributes?
>
> inherit from ...?
>From global (i.e. non-cell specific) column/row line attributes, what else.
> > This would make sense
Alfredo wrote:
> What happends when you insert a new row, does its cells inherit column/row
> attributes?
inherit from ...?
> This would make sense. OTOH, just copying the row above would
> make also sense. ;-)
personally i don't see why i would like a copy of a previous line or the line
the cu
