Re: [patch] remove unneeded code

2004-01-05 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 08:06:06PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> | On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:16:16AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: >> >> Hi Andre, >> >> >> >> I have seen that you removed method "

Re: [patch] remove unneeded code

2004-01-05 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 08:06:06PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:16:16AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: > >> Hi Andre, > >> > >> I have seen that you removed method "insertInset". Could you please tell > >> me where

Re: [patch] remove unneeded code

2004-01-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:16:16AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: >> Hi Andre, >> >> I have seen that you removed method "insertInset". Could you please tell >> me where the magic code is nowadays that prevents the insertion of an >> inset into an ERT

Re: [patch] remove unneeded code

2003-12-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:16:16AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: > Hi Andre, > > I have seen that you removed method "insertInset". Could you please tell > me where the magic code is nowadays that prevents the insertion of an > inset into an ERT inset? I can't find it. This should be handled by

Re: [patch] remove unneeded code

2003-12-10 Thread Michael Schmitt
Hi Andre, I have seen that you removed method "insertInset". Could you please tell me where the magic code is nowadays that prevents the insertion of an inset into an ERT inset? I can't find it. Thanks, Michael