Re: [patch] reduce number of updates

2003-11-14 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Andre Poenitz wrote: > Ups. Sorry. I though it was compiling but then I might have commited from > the wrong machine (again). Was a bit in a hurry. Sorry. > > Could anybody please try to fix that? I won't get access to the sources > before Monday. Maybe you sent the patch from the wrong machine,

Re: [patch] reduce number of updates

2003-11-14 Thread Andre Poenitz
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | E.g just one instead of three per . >> > | Plus removal of deleteLyXText >> > | Plus caching 'beginOfBodyPos'. >> > | We should be faster than 1.3 now.. > > You do so much reindetation that it is impossible to see what you are > actually changing. >

Re: [patch] reduce number of updates

2003-11-13 Thread Kuba Ober
On Thursday 13 November 2003 08:46 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > - case LFUN_MENURELOAD: { > > I don't think either we should be loading menure... isn't this called > 'a load of BS'? > > C'mon, if we all didn't have some fun in the process it would be no fun, right? :) Cheers, Kuba Obe

Re: [patch] reduce number of updates

2003-11-13 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | E.g just one instead of three per . > | Plus removal of deleteLyXText > | Plus caching 'beginOfBodyPos'. > | We should be faster than 1.3 now.. You do so much reindetation that it is impossible to see what you are actually changing. but I noticed that

Re: [patch] reduce number of updates

2003-11-13 Thread martin . vermeer
> - case LFUN_MENURELOAD: { I don't think either we should be loading menure... isn't this called 'a load of BS'? - Martin