> If you say it works, I'm prepared to take your word for it.
It seems that the JASA officials are currently deciding what LaTeX class should be used in future,
after I contacted them with my layout and template file. So before I didn't get a decision from
them, I'll postpone this.
> Besides,
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
Do I now get your OK?
in principle yes, but i did not have time to look at it.
You don't have to. It is just another layout file from me (my 5th). So
its structure and template is the same for my other layouts for other
journals.
If you say
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
Do I now get your OK?
in principle yes, but i did not have time to look at it.
You don't have to. It is just another layout file from me (my 5th). So its structure and template is
the same for my other layouts for other journals.
regards Uwe
Le 7 oct. 08 à 19:20, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
Seeking for 2 OKs to go in. Jürgen, can this also go to branch?
What about bug 5330, then?
Although this bug had nothing to do with my layout file, it it
fixed now by Richard.
Do I now get your OK?
in principle yes,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
Seeking for 2 OKs to go in. Jürgen, can this also go to branch?
What about bug 5330, then?
Although this bug had nothing to do with my layout file, it it fixed now by
Richard.
Do I now get your OK?
regards Uwe
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
What about bug 5330, then?
This has nothing to do with this layout, I only used this as example.
Bug 5330 appears for any layout file that use now modularized include files.
The example jasa layout
I attached as example to this bug report is not the one I attache
Le 7 oct. 08 à 03:22, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
The attached patch adds a template and a layout file for the
journal JASA
http://asa.aip.org/jasa.html
following the official author guidelines and using the official
LaTeX class.
Seeking for 2 OKs to go in. Jürgen, can this also go to branch?
Wha
