Am Montag, 6. November 2006 14:49 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Well, my fixes in this area were not mainly this point, and I _seem_
> to remember that I did that only because it looked nicer. So I think
> indeed that we should revert this.
I did this in 1.4 and trunk. Joost, could you please c
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 04:26:01PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri schrieb:
>
> >> And the
> >> fact that LyX will eat the other braces if you read the file, and then the
> >> inner ones if you save it and read it again.
> >
> > Nope. That will only occur if the size of the nucleu
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 04:25:33PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> - do something that you want to undo (e.g. cut). The cursor must be in a
> brace inset that will not be restored after undo because of the removal of
> superflous brace insets.
> - undo
>
> Now you will either get an assert, or a warni
Enrico Forestieri schrieb:
>> And the
>> fact that LyX will eat the other braces if you read the file, and then the
>> inner ones if you save it and read it again.
>
> Nope. That will only occur if the size of the nucleus is 1, but then it
> doesn't matter as latex macros don't need braces around
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Nope. That will only occur if the size of the nucleus is 1, but then it
> doesn't matter as latex macros don't need braces around a single token
> argument.
Yes, you are right, I mixed that up.
>> This will also create undo/redo problems, since undo/redo in math goes
>
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Well, my fixes in this area were not mainly this point, and I
>> _seem_ to remember that I did that only because it looked nicer. So
>> I think indeed that we should revert this.
Enrico> I am curious to know if reverting this wil
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 02:49:29PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Georg> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 12:17:53PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> >> wrote:
> >>> Would it be a big problem (esthetics aside) to
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 01:37:56PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > I beg your pardon, but what's wrong with writing {\xxx{aa}}^2
> > if you want to preserve the braces? See attached file.
>
> The fact that old files that previously worked did not work anymore.
You have
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 12:17:53PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>> wrote:
>>> Would it be a big problem (esthetics aside) to always leave the
>>> braces alone? I do not like behaviour that is not predictable.
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 12:17:53PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>> Would it be a big problem (esthetics aside) to always leave the braces
>> alone? I do not like behaviour that is not predictable.
No, it would not be a problem. The only drawback are the visible
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 12:17:53PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> Georg> I don't think that that will work. What does work for me
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Georg> I don't think that that will work. What does work for me is to
Georg> test the previous inset: If it is unknown, do not remove the
Georg> b
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Georg> I don't think that that will work. What does work for me is to
> Georg> test the previous inset: If it is unknown, do not remove the
> Georg> braces.
>
> And what about \xxx{aa}{bb}^2
I
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> I don't think that that will work. What does work for me is to
Georg> test the previous inset: If it is unknown, do not remove the
Georg> braces.
And what about \xxx{aa}{bb}^2
It seems difficult to find a good solution, actually.
J
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Georg> A colleague of mine discovered a math parser bug that was
> Georg> introduced in 1.4. The attached test file works fine in 1.3 but
> Georg> produces a LaTeX error in 1.4. The reason is sp
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> A colleague of mine discovered a math parser bug that was
Georg> introduced in 1.4. The attached test file works fine in 1.3 but
Georg> produces a LaTeX error in 1.4. The reason is special treatment
Georg> of things like {}_0 that was
16 matches
Mail list logo
