Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Georg> - remove *TOC.lyx from CVS - add Makefile.depend to CVS (not
> Georg> needed for GNU make, but might be needed for other flavours of
> Georg> make) - apply the patch
>
> Georg> Is this O
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Here is an updated patch. It fixes the problem that the TOC
Georg> files were not automatically generated for the distribution.
Georg> The Makefile now works both for srcdir=builddir and
Georg> srcdir!=builddir.
Georg> I plan to do th
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 September 2005 14:54, Georg Baum wrote:
>> Jose' Matos wrote:
>> > Passing as destination dir as argument is enough to fix this, right?
>>
>> No, it was a bit more.
>> The attached patch should fix bug 2027 and does the following:
>> - fix wrong syntax in de_
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 14:54, Georg Baum wrote:
> Jose' Matos wrote:
> > Passing as destination dir as argument is enough to fix this, right?
>
> No, it was a bit more.
> The attached patch should fix bug 2027 and does the following:
> - fix wrong syntax in de_Userguide and it_Userguide
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| | > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| |
| | Georg> python is now required if building from CVS, because I included
| | Georg> Makefile.depend in Makefile.am.
| |
| | Wha
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 15:24, Georg Baum wrote:
> Jose' Matos wrote:
> > I need this patch to run doc_toc.py with several documents. Haven't you
> > noticed it?
>
> No. What does happen without the patch?
It does not work. :-)
Because the table that holds the relation is reversed, each
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Hmm... I don't think we want this Makefile.depend thingie at
Lars> all.
So, how would you do that? Is there some way to reuse automake's dependency
tracking code?
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Georg> python is now required if building from CVS, because I included
| Georg> Makefile.depend in Makefile.am.
|
| What happens at the beginning when Makefile.depend does not exist? H
Jose' Matos wrote:
> I need this patch to run doc_toc.py with several documents. Haven't you
> noticed it?
No. What does happen without the patch?
Georg
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What happens at the beginning when Makefile.depend does not exist?
GNU make issues a warning that it does not exist and creates it.
> How
> do you bootstrap? Shouldn't we distribute this file in CVS?
I don't know if the behaviour of GNU make is standard. If not we
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 14:54, Georg Baum wrote:
>
> Comments?
I need this patch to run doc_toc.py with several documents. Haven't you
noticed it?
Index: LyX.py
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/lib/lyx2lyx/LyX.p
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> python is now required if building from CVS, because I included
Georg> Makefile.depend in Makefile.am.
What happens at the beginning when Makefile.depend does not exist? How
do you bootstrap? Shouldn't we distribute this file in CVS?
Jose' Matos wrote:
> Passing as destination dir as argument is enough to fix this, right?
No, it was a bit more.
The attached patch should fix bug 2027 and does the following:
- fix wrong syntax in de_Userguide and it_Userguide
- change the build system so that the TOC files are generated autom
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 19:16, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 20. September 2005 19:37 schrieb Jose' Matos:
> > That is fair, I will take a look into it and I will try to see what
>
> can be
>
> > done.
>
> I already did it - patch follows later after some testing.
Passing as destinatio
Am Dienstag, 20. September 2005 19:37 schrieb Jose' Matos:
> That is fair, I will take a look into it and I will try to see what
can be
> done.
I already did it - patch follows later after some testing.
Georg
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 14:15, Georg Baum wrote:
>
> > Why? I am not opposing it, I am simply surprised why we need it.
>
> Some people (including me) like to build outside the source tree...
That is fair, I will take a look into it and I will try to see what can be
done.
> Georg
--
J
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 September 2005 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Thanks. It would be nice to make it work when building outside of the
>> source tree, but I guess this is optional.
>
> Why? I am not opposing it, I am simply surprised why we need it.
Some people (includin
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Thanks. It would be nice to make it work when building outside of the
> source tree, but I guess this is optional.
Why? I am not opposing it, I am simply surprised why we need it.
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> 5. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them at "make
>> dist" time
>>
>> This would avoid python for installation.
Georg> This is the best solution IMO if the premise is to have no
Georg>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> 5. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them at "make dist"
> time
>
> This would avoid python for installation.
This is the best solution IMO if the premise is to have no python build
dependency. I'll prepare a patch.
Georg
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 12:52, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> 5. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them at "make dist"
> time
>
> This would avoid python for installation.
Now, it is your choice. :-)
At least for 1.4 that is probably a good thing to do.
> JMarc
--
Jos
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Monday 19 September 2005 12:51, Georg Baum wrote:
>> What shall we do with the original patch? I did some further research and
>> found out that the *_TOC.lyx documents in the repository are not
>> generated by doc_toc.py.
>
> As I told bellow this was done to avoid a ru
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 4. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and create them at build
>> time
Jose'> This option implies that you have to use python for
Jose'> installation. Certainly I don't mind. ;-)
or
5. Remove the TOC docs from the repository and
On Monday 19 September 2005 12:51, Georg Baum wrote:
> What shall we do with the original patch? I did some further research and
> found out that the *_TOC.lyx documents in the repository are not generated
> by doc_toc.py.
As I told bellow this was done to avoid a run time dependency on python.
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: This patch fixes them, can it go
Georg> in?
>> I think it can.
Georg> It is in now. What shall we do with the original patch? I did
Georg> some further research and found out that the *_TOC.lyx
Georg> docu
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Georg> This patch fixes them, can it go in?
>
> I think it can.
It is in now.
What shall we do with the original patch? I did some further research and
found out that the *_TOC.lyx documents in the repository are not generated
by doc_toc.py. doc_toc.py puts the sect
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Am Freitag, 16. September 2005 16:31 schrieb Jean-Marc
Georg> Lasgouttes:
>> Nevertheless, the bug you are looking for is in lib/doc/doc_toc.py.
Georg> Yes, doc_toc.py does not include the english versions of the
Georg> documents that
On Sunday 18 September 2005 19:55, Bo Peng wrote:
> > For me that is a burden, the absence of the extended operators in
> > python (+=, -=, ... op=) makes the code dull, the fact that string were
> > made a first class type only in python 2.0 does not help either.
>
> What? += and string class is
> For me that is a burden, the absence of the extended operators in python
> (+=, -=, ... op=) makes the code dull, the fact that string were made a first
> class type only in python 2.0 does not help either.
What? += and string class is not in 1.5.2? I use it a lot in configure.py.
> If you
On Sunday 18 September 2005 10:18, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> I understand that string.strip(foo) is deprecated in favour of foo.strip().
> Ditto with string.split(foo).
>
> http://docs.python.org/lib/node110.html
>
> José, why do we continue to use the deprecated versions? Support for
> ancient Pyth
Georg Baum wrote:
>> Nevertheless, the bug you are looking for is in lib/doc/doc_toc.py.
> Yes, doc_toc.py does not include the english versions of the documents
> that are not yet translated, but there are also two bugs in lyx2lyx.
> This patch fixes them, can it go in?
I understand that string.
Am Freitag, 16. September 2005 16:31 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Nevertheless, the bug you are looking for is in lib/doc/doc_toc.py.
Yes, doc_toc.py does not include the english versions of the documents
that are not yet translated, but there are also two bugs in lyx2lyx.
This patch fixes t
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Georg> Due to a lyx2lyx bug we have broken documents in lib/doc. See
> Georg> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027 for details. This
> Georg> patch repairs the documents, but does not fi
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Due to a lyx2lyx bug we have broken documents in lib/doc. See
Georg> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027 for details. This
Georg> patch repairs the documents, but does not fix the original
Georg> lyx2lyx bug.
Georg> OK to app
34 matches
Mail list logo
