> Therefore I have added a bool to checkAndLoadLyXFile that skips the
> test for dirtyness and simply loads the master only if it is not
> already loaded. The bool is only used in this specific case, so there
> should be no surprises.
This is exactly what I wanted.
Thanks,
Günter
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Therefore I have added a bool to checkAndLoadLyXFile that skips the test
> > for dirtyness and simply loads the master only if it is not already
> > loaded. The bool is only used in this specific case, so there should
Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Therefore I have added a bool to checkAndLoadLyXFile that skips the test for
> dirtyness and simply loads the master only if it is not already loaded. The
> bool is only used in this specific case, so there should be no surprises.
This looks good.
