José Matos wrote:
On Monday 24 September 2007 17:48:52 Richard Heck wrote:
URL insets used in LaTeX documents should presumably become URL
charstyles. But we do not want to do this for docbook documents. How do
we tell from inside lyx2lyx whether we're doing one or the other?
It is ea
On Monday 24 September 2007 17:48:52 Richard Heck wrote:
> URL insets used in LaTeX documents should presumably become URL
> charstyles. But we do not want to do this for docbook documents. How do
> we tell from inside lyx2lyx whether we're doing one or the other?
It is easy. :-)
You can test
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> OK, I'm opening a bug report that this isn't lost.
Try this
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2265
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller schrieb:
Why not for LyX 1.5.2? You wrote on the lyx-docs list that you plan to
release LyX 1.5.2 next week.
As I wrote in my status update today, I want people to concentrate on the four
remaining crucial bugs only. Call it "partial freeze".
OK, I'm opening a bug report
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Why not for LyX 1.5.2? You wrote on the lyx-docs list that you plan to
> release LyX 1.5.2 next week.
As I wrote in my status update today, I want people to concentrate on the four
remaining crucial bugs only. Call it "partial freeze". This is not a crucial
issue IMHO.
Jürgen
> Yes, this would be o.k. (for 1.5.3, though).
Why not for LyX 1.5.2? You wrote on the lyx-docs list that you plan to release
LyX 1.5.2 next week.
regards Uwe
Richard Heck schrieb:
That leaves the other issue: Changing this dialog from url to href, or
at least allowing href, since we now have hyperref, anyway. I'd vote for
changing, since url does not need to be an InsetCommand but can just be
a charstyle, which it is in the URL module.
For LyX 1.
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
+packages << "\\usepackage{url}\n"
+" \\newcommand{\\url}{\\texttt}\n";
Why do you keep the \newcommand{\url}? It causes an error, doesn't it?
Because I didn't realize that it was the second argument of the \if
command
Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, now that it is a simple feature. Patch attached.
Perfect.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
+ packages << "\\usepackage{url}\n"
+ " \\newcommand{\\url}{\\texttt}\n";
Why do you keep the \newcommand{\url}? It causes an error, doesn't it?
Because I didn't realize that it was the second argument of the \
Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Attached is a patch.
> + packages << "\\usepackage{url}\n"
> + " \\newcommand{\\url}{\\texttt}\n";
Why do you keep the \newcommand{\url}? It causes an error, doesn't it?
Actually, you should move "url" hand
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Yes, url.sty is standard in all LaTeX-distributions (I guess also in
> tetex2), so it is save to remove the unneeded \IfFileExists command, so
> that people can use latex2html.
>
> Attached is a patch.
>
> Jürgen, what do you think?
Yes, this would be o.k. (for 1.5.3, though).
12 matches
Mail list logo
