Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 18:12 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> I know that, the question was more about the destruction of
> BufferView::Pimpl which I don't see in lyx_gui. AFAIU, we shall make
> sure that this destruction happens after the one of QApplication (I am
> not saying it does not, just t
Georg Baum wrote:
Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 17:15 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
Yes I mean destruction. Right now, WorkArea creation is done in
BufferView::Pimpl::Pimpl construction (I don't know when this
construction happen).
workarea_.reset(WorkAreaFactory::create(*owner_, width, height));
Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 17:15 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> Yes I mean destruction. Right now, WorkArea creation is done in
> BufferView::Pimpl::Pimpl construction (I don't know when this
> construction happen).
>
>workarea_.reset(WorkAreaFactory::create(*owner_, width, height));
>screen_
Georg Baum wrote:
Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 16:47 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
I see it's too late. No big deal but please let's discuss before you
commit your upcoming patch.
See my other mail. I will not commit that for some days, since it needs
testing.
OK.
By the way, I think the initiali
Georg Baum wrote:
Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 16:39 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
Did you read my post Georg?
I did, but it came in after I sent my previous mail.
Here is what I have currently so if you think there will be conflict, I
think we should discuss before you apply this to qt4.
There w
Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 16:47 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> I see it's too late. No big deal but please let's discuss before you
> commit your upcoming patch.
See my other mail. I will not commit that for some days, since it needs
testing.
> By the way, I think the initialisation problem comes
Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 16:39 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> Did you read my post Georg?
I did, but it came in after I sent my previous mail.
> Here is what I have currently so if you think there will be conflict, I
> think we should discuss before you apply this to qt4.
There will be a technica
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Georg Baum wrote:
This patch removes the empty LQApplication destructor, since the
compiler will generate one as needed. It makes my upcoming
"QApplication exit crash" patch a tiny bit smaller and goes in now.
Did you read my post Georg?
Here is what I have currently
Georg Baum wrote:
This patch removes the empty LQApplication destructor, since the compiler
will generate one as needed. It makes my upcoming "QApplication exit
crash" patch a tiny bit smaller and goes in now.
Did you read my post Georg?
Here is what I have currently so if you think there wil
