Re: [patch] InsetTabular simplification

2003-07-18 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 05:39:58PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Don't use LyXCursor if you need two ints. > Fair enough. Just curious, but what might have been the point of the cast to > void here? It just looks ridiculous to my inexperienced eyes. Maybe to state explici

Re: [patch] InsetTabular simplification

2003-07-18 Thread Angus Leeming
Andre Poenitz wrote: > Don't use LyXCursor if you need two ints. Fair enough. Just curious, but what might have been the point of the cast to void here? It just looks ridiculous to my inexperienced eyes. > -(void)tabular.getRowOfLTFirstHead(row, ltt); -- Angus