Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>>>On Tuesday 23 July 2002 10:06 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>>
>>>
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Monday 22 July 2002 8:16 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>>
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 23 July 2002 10:06 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>>>Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>| On Monday 22 July 2002 8:16 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>>
>I think this patch should go in:
>
>>>|
>>
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 10:30 am, Herbert Voss wrote:
> what for is it needed?? I don't have it.
???
Now you have /me/ worried.
aleem@pneumon:graphics-> cvs update
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
cvs server: Updating .
aleem@pneumon:graphics-> cvs diff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
cvs server: D
Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 July 2002 10:06 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>| On Monday 22 July 2002 8:16 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
I think this patch should go in:
>>|
>>| Fair enough. Does it get rid of Lsstream.h too? No
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 10:06 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Monday 22 July 2002 8:16 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> I think this patch should go in:
> |
> | Fair enough. Does it get rid of Lsstream.h too? No, probably not.
>
> afaics Lsstrea
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Monday 22 July 2002 8:16 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I think this patch should go in:
>
| Fair enough. Does it get rid of Lsstream.h too? No, probably not.
afaics Lsstream.h is not included in this file.
--
Lgb
On Monday 22 July 2002 8:16 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I think this patch should go in:
Fair enough. Does it get rid of Lsstream.h too? No, probably not.
Angus
