Re: [patch] Dot -> Image formats

2010-04-02 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
rgheck wrote: > > btw i think this is also for branch. Juergen? > > > > > > Yes, also for branch. Yes, for 1.6.7, though. Jürgen

Re: [patch] Dot -> Image formats

2010-03-31 Thread rgheck
On 03/31/2010 12:29 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Richard Heck wrote: Committed, then, without the jpg thing. only in your local tree? ;) I got a conflict and had to resolve it. Done now. btw i think this is also for branch. Juergen? Yes, also for branch. rh

Re: [patch] Dot -> Image formats

2010-03-31 Thread Pavel Sanda
Richard Heck wrote: > Committed, then, without the jpg thing. only in your local tree? ;) btw i think this is also for branch. Juergen? pavel

Re: [patch] Dot -> Image formats

2010-03-31 Thread rgheck
On 03/31/2010 09:38 AM, Julien Rioux wrote: On 31/03/2010 8:46 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Julien Rioux wrote: lost somehow. Therefore I suggest the following patch, using the dot looks fine. if you have tested that it works for both ps and pdf correctly, we will put it in. pavel I did test

Re: [patch] Dot -> Image formats

2010-03-31 Thread Julien Rioux
On 31/03/2010 8:46 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Julien Rioux wrote: lost somehow. Therefore I suggest the following patch, using the dot looks fine. if you have tested that it works for both ps and pdf correctly, we will put it in. pavel I did test it; ps and pdf output works correctly. The jpg

Re: [patch] Dot -> Image formats

2010-03-31 Thread Pavel Sanda
Julien Rioux wrote: > lost somehow. Therefore I suggest the following patch, using the dot looks fine. if you have tested that it works for both ps and pdf correctly, we will put it in. pavel