Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Your patch is very big (size wise) and I am afraid that at least to me
| > that muddles a bit what is happening in it, and it really is tiresome
| > to read such huge patches.
|
| Which is exactly the reason why I sugg
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Your patch is very big (size wise) and I am afraid that at least to me
| > that muddles a bit what is happening in it, and it really is tiresome
| > to read such huge patches.
|
| Which is exactly the reason why I sugg
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Your patch is very big (size wise) and I am afraid that at least to me
| > that muddles a bit what is happening in it, and it really is tiresome
| > to read such huge patches.
|
| Which is exactly the reason why I suggested to read the svn diff in
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Abdel.
|
| Index: buffer_funcs.cpp
| ===
| --- buffer_funcs.cpp (revision 19485)
| +++ buffer_funcs.cpp (working copy)
| @@ -614,4 +616,25 @@
| }
|
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
> Your patch is very big (size wise) and I am afraid that at least to me
> that muddles a bit what is happening in it, and it really is tiresome
> to read such huge patches.
Probably seeing the synthetic svn log (that has to be written for
the commi
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Abdel.
|
| Index: buffer_funcs.cpp
| ===
| --- buffer_funcs.cpp (revision 19485)
| +++ buffer_funcs.cpp (working copy)
| @@ -614,4 +616,25 @@
| }
| }
|
| +
| +void loadChildD
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I reluctantly removed this change from the patch. I wasted two hours
>> because of this even if I strongly believe this is useless. I am not
>> willing to split the patch even more. So take it as it is or forget
>> about it.
>
> I forgot to revert a
