Re: [Patch] parser.diff

2002-06-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:42:29AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> No, completely unrelated. > > And do you have plans for this one? I am looking into it... Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T.

Re: [Patch] parser.diff

2002-05-31 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:42:29AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> Also, what about macros with multiple arguments? Is this the same > >> problem? > > Andre> No, completely unrelated. > > And do you have plans for this one? Aehm. What exactly goes wrong there? I can read/save/read that

Re: [Patch] parser.diff

2002-05-31 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 10:57:19AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Andre> wrote: >> Is the 'small parser problem' bad enough that it should eventually >> go in 1.2.x? Andre> No! That's just the "'\\' in simple math problem". OK, I th

Re: [Patch] parser.diff

2002-05-31 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 10:57:19AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Is the 'small parser problem' bad enough that it should eventually go > in 1.2.x? No! That's just the "'\\' in simple math problem". > Also, what about macros with multiple arguments? Is this the same > problem? No, complet

Re: [Patch] parser.diff

2002-05-31 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> This is a tentative patch to fix that cute "small parser Andre> problem". Andre> It works for a few things, but there was a severe change in the Andre> parsing logic necessary (we try to read "grids" now by default, Andre> whereas