On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 13:03 +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> Is it not possible to do this without changes to ControlRef?
> >
> | Sure, I can do
> | kernel().dispatch(FuncRequest(LFUN_LABEL_GOTO, ref));
> | within GRef. But if I want to start dispatching LFUNs from frontend
> | code, half of
John Spray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 10:04 +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | Patches attached. I won't apply this GRef until someone loves the
>> | addition to ControlRef enough to commit it (I only have write access to
>> | frontends/gtk, I think).
>>
>> Is it no
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 10:31 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Patches attached. I won't apply this GRef until someone loves the
> | addition to ControlRef enough to commit it (I only have write access
> | to frontends/gtk, I
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 10:04 +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Patches attached. I won't apply this GRef until someone loves the
> | addition to ControlRef enough to commit it (I only have write access to
> | frontends/gtk, I think).
>
> Is it not possible to do this without changes to Control
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Patches attached. I won't apply this GRef until someone loves the
| addition to ControlRef enough to commit it (I only have write access
| to frontends/gtk, I think).
Lars> Is it not possible to do this without changes to ControlR
John Spray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hello,
>
| I've finished A. Klostermann's reference dialog, and in the process
| added something to ControlRef which may or may not please. The function
| added (gotoAnotherRef) is simply a version of gotoRef which does not set
| the bookmark for the "Back
