On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 12:03:10PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> And it is good practise and make us follow and adhere to the
> requirements put down in the standard.
What's wrong in paragraphlist_fwd?
If "#include "paragraph.h" is really needed, it could as well be
dropped and the whole t
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> The only thing to consider is that currently the concept
Lars> checking is turned on with --enable-debug (default on), but we
Lars> might want a separate flag for this --enable-concept-checks. But
Lars> unless somebody really wa
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> And it is good practise and make us follow and adhere to the
| Lars> requirements put down in the standard.
>
| That's good. There is a 10% penalty in disk size, but that's O
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> And it is good practise and make us follow and adhere to the
Lars> requirements put down in the standard.
That's good. There is a 10% penalty in disk size, but that's OK.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> I had forgotten that gcc does not turn on concept checks by
| Lars> defalt, so I did that for builds where --enable-debug is on.
>
| Lars> This showed a few problems, but mos
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I had forgotten that gcc does not turn on concept checks by
Lars> defalt, so I did that for builds where --enable-debug is on.
Lars> This showed a few problems, but mostly we are in _very_ good
Lars> shape.
Lars> I think we sh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| I have not checked qt and gtk yet, but will do that as well.
| (but I don't expect the same problems there as with xforms.)
And gtk seems to be even worse since libsigc fails a lot of checks...
not good. I wonder who to beat up...
--
Lgb
