Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> You could tag 2.0.7.1 in git but not release the tar file. I feel that
> releasing 2.0.7.1 for only one architecture will be misleading.
We did exactly the same with 1.6.4.1 & 1.6.4.2 with news items
stating that only Mac people should worry.
Pavel
28/01/2014 00:06, Richard Heck:
Go ahead. I've already made a couple commits, and will have to create a
new branch, or something, in order to do 2.0.7.1, if we release a binary
of that.
Done.
What's your view on that? Presumably, anyone who wanted to build on OSX
would need to use the updated
On 01/27/2014 05:14 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 11/01/14 20:12, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
This is from last July. Actually, the simple version has been applied at
3e073ec91930eced. Can I backport to branch? And if yes, now or after
2.0.7?
Richard, can I backport 3e073ec91930eced t
Le 11/01/14 20:12, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
This is from last July. Actually, the simple version has been applied at
3e073ec91930eced. Can I backport to branch? And if yes, now or after 2.0.7?
Richard, can I backport 3e073ec91930eced to branch? Or do we wait until
something is decided wr
11/01/2014 20:12, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
This is from last July. Actually, the simple version has been applied at
3e073ec91930eced. Can I backport to branch? And if yes, now or after 2.0.7?
Richard?
JMarc
Le 14/07/13 20:36, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
For some reason, I cannot compile anymore on OS X. It turns out that,
for Qt libraries on OS X,
pkg-config --libs-only-l QtCore
and
pkg-config --libs-only-L QtCore
return empty values, which is not wrong considering that on OS X, we use
no -
17/07/2013 11:31, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Can I commit the simple patch to 2.1/2.0?
Vincent? Richard?
I pushed it to master and will push to branch unless Richard complains.
JMarc
Le 14/07/2013 20:36, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
For some reason, I cannot compile anymore on OS X. It turns out that,
for Qt libraries on OS X,
pkg-config --libs-only-l QtCore
and
pkg-config --libs-only-L QtCore
return empty values, which is not wrong considering that on OS X, we use
no
