On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 04:28:52PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Given that the QDialog destroys itself (the WDestructiveClose flag is set)
Yes, that's the ticket.
john
John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 03:52:00PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> >> This patch, part I, changes nothing in LyX's operation. Well
>> >> actually, that's not quite true; it enables the Qt Alert dialogs to
>> >> know who their parent is so that dialogs are stacked in the corre
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 03:52:00PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> This patch, part I, changes nothing in LyX's operation. Well actually,
> >> that's not quite true; it enables the Qt Alert dialogs to know who their
> >> parent is so that dialogs are stacked in the correct order.
> >
> > Alarm b
John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 07:22:31PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> This patch, part I, changes nothing in LyX's operation. Well actually,
>> that's not quite true; it enables the Qt Alert dialogs to know who their
>> parent is so that dialogs are stacked in the correct order.
John Levon wrote:
>> This patch ... enables the Qt Alert dialogs to know who their
>> parent is so that dialogs are stacked in the correct order.
> Alarm bells are ringing. Gotta go now, remind me to come back to this
> one
Will do.
--
Angus
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 07:22:31PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> This patch, part I, changes nothing in LyX's operation. Well actually,
> that's not quite true; it enables the Qt Alert dialogs to know who their
> parent is so that dialogs are stacked in the correct order.
Alarm bells are ringing.
Angus Leeming wrote:
> My patch to allow "spaces in file names" or not depending on LaTeX's
> abilities has become quite large simply because I've also removed a heap
> of bloat. I've decided, therefore, to split the patch into two.
>
> This patch, part I, changes nothing in LyX's operation. Well
