On Friday 21 June 2002 2:03 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 01:36:40PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > However, looking at compress_redraw in event.c (starts at line 540)
> > suggests to me that the xev dimensions ARE thrown away. Could you have a
> > look and tell me I'm wrong ple
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 01:36:40PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> However, looking at compress_redraw in event.c (starts at line 540) suggests
> to me that the xev dimensions ARE thrown away. Could you have a look and tell
> me I'm wrong please ;-)
You're wrong.
I think. The compress_redraw is
On Friday 21 June 2002 1:27 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 01:06:48PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > But we get an FL_DRAW: what parts of the pixmap should we copy into the
> > > real lyx window ? We don't know from this point, so we have to copy the
> > > whole thing :/
> >
>
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 01:06:48PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > But we get an FL_DRAW: what parts of the pixmap should we copy into the
> > real lyx window ? We don't know from this point, so we have to copy the
> > whole thing :/
>
> But we do know if xev contains this info and (if my xforms
On Friday 21 June 2002 12:32 pm, John Levon wrote:
> > So, it looks to me that your patch + my xforms patch will allow us to
> > redraw only a part of the window, with the XScreen::draw proviso above.
>
> But we get an FL_DRAW: what parts of the pixmap should we copy into the
> real lyx window ? W
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 12:13:28PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > That's what the patch I sent does (should do)
>
> Maybe ;-) But I'm confused by XScreen::draw:
>
> XCopyArea (fl_get_display(),
> owner_.getWin(), // owner_.getPixmap(),
>
On Friday 21 June 2002 11:55 am, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 10:04:32AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > So, the next step is to make the screen modify the work area pixmap (hide
> > the work area window) and emit an expose call.
>
> That's what the patch I sent does (should do)
Ma
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 10:04:32AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> So, the next step is to make the screen modify the work area pixmap (hide the
> work area window) and emit an expose call.
That's what the patch I sent does (should do)
> Now does the associated XEvent *
> xev have info about wh
On Thursday 20 June 2002 7:07 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 06:20:09PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > Well I've only browsed your xforms email, but we need a sub-region not
> > > the entire workarea object, unless you fancy copying a massive pixmap
> > > on every cursor blink
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 06:20:09PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Well I've only browsed your xforms email, but we need a sub-region not
> > the entire workarea object, unless you fancy copying a massive pixmap on
> > every cursor blink (didn't think so).
>
> That's what we do now. See the cod
On Thursday 20 June 2002 6:13 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 05:51:56PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > because of the loop in objects.c's mark_for_redraw / fl_redraw_form:
> > for (ob = form->first; ob; ob = ob->next)
> > ob->redraw = 1;
> > that is called by fl_h
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 05:51:56PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> because of the loop in objects.c's mark_for_redraw / fl_redraw_form:
> for (ob = form->first; ob; ob = ob->next)
> ob->redraw = 1;
> that is called by fl_handle_forms and flags all objects on the form for
> redr
On Thursday 20 June 2002 5:49 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 05:26:16PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > So that means that the code in XScreen that calls
> > XCopyArea (display, cursor_pixmap, owner_.getWin(), ...
> > direct is incorrect (which is your comment about the cursor
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 05:26:16PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> So that means that the code in XScreen that calls
> XCopyArea (display, cursor_pixmap, owner_.getWin(), ...
> direct is incorrect (which is your comment about the cursor being broken)?
>
> Instead it should call
> XCo
On Thursday 20 June 2002 4:36 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 11:33:29AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > BufferView and lyxfunc no longer resize() themselves. Presumably because
> > the resize event is coming from behind the frontends firewall and they
> > should be told about it,
15 matches
Mail list logo
