Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> By the way, we can also have a MERGE_LINE option along AS_STR_INSET...
Yes.
JMarc
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I am not sure that it looks good after all. For ToC, textString is
>> certainly not supposed to output multiple lines...
>>
> That's why I limited it to the first line?
OK, sorry.
JMarc
On 26/09/2008 17:41, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak Younes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I think of plaintext as 'verbose export' and textString as 'compact export'.
OK, next iteration.
This looks good. You mi
On 26/09/2008 17:41, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak Younes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I think of plaintext as 'verbose export' and textString as 'compact export'.
OK, next iteration.
This looks good. You mi
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I think of plaintext as 'verbose export' and textString as 'compact export'.
>>>
>> OK, next iteration.
>
> This looks good. You might want to look at InsetFlex::textString too.
I am not sure t
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think of plaintext as 'verbose export' and textString as 'compact export'.
>>
> OK, next iteration.
This looks good. You might want to look at InsetFlex::textString too.
JMarc
On 26/09/2008 16:42, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Because you want to get rid of addToToc() and let the decision be made
in textString()? IMO textString() is just a helper method that is
useful for toc but could be also used for other purpose (ex:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Because you want to get rid of addToToc() and let the decision be made
> in textString()? IMO textString() is just a helper method that is
> useful for toc but could be also used for other purpose (ex:
> tooltips). And yes, optional should overload it
On 26/09/2008 15:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
There may be insets (think footnotes) that rely on not appearing there.
Then InsetFootnote just have to overload the method.
I think the rule is more that most insettext should not
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There may be insets (think footnotes) that rely on not appearing there.
>
> Then InsetFootnote just have to overload the method.
I think the rule is more that most insettext should not appear in toc (think
optional arguments too). And your patch wil
On 26/09/2008 15:40, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Is the attached what you have in mind?
Updated patch to cope with carriage return.
Yes, except that I am not 100% sure that it should go to InsetText.
Well, the goal would be
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is the attached what you have in mind?
>
> Updated patch to cope with carriage return.
Yes, except that I am not 100% sure that it should go to InsetText.
There may be insets (think footnotes) that rely on not appearing there.
JMarc
On 26/09/2008 15:22, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 26/09/2008 14:20, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On 24/09/2008 05:43, Jack M. Lyon wrote:
It would also be nice to display each index entry in its entirety
rather
than just a snippet . . .
This is im
On 26/09/2008 14:20, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On 24/09/2008 05:43, Jack M. Lyon wrote:
It would also be nice to display each index entry in its entirety rather
than just a snippet . . .
This is implemented in the attached patc
On 26/09/2008 14:20, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On 24/09/2008 05:43, Jack M. Lyon wrote:
It would also be nice to display each index entry in its entirety rather
than just a snippet . . .
This is implemented in the attached patc
On Friday 26 September 2008 10:51:44 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> This is implemented in the attached patch. I think this is safe for rc3
> Jose but this is your call.
>
> Abdel.
Let us wait here. The patch is OK for after rc3 (with Jean-Marc's remark).
--
José Abílio
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 24/09/2008 05:43, Jack M. Lyon wrote:
>> It would also be nice to display each index entry in its entirety rather
>> than just a snippet . . .
>>
>
> This is implemented in the attached patch. I think this is safe for
> rc3 Jose but this is you
17 matches
Mail list logo
