Re: [PATCH] Re: Lyx 1.5.X and gcc 4.3.0

2008-06-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Do I read correctly that we should apply the following patch to branch? > > Just go ahead if you think it's necessary. Done. JMarc

Re: [PATCH] Re: Lyx 1.5.X and gcc 4.3.0

2008-06-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I see that lyx::support::abort is not defined anymore, but that it is >> still referenced in src/client/boost.cpp. What does this mean? > > nothing, its in comment ;) It looks like grep lied to me :) JMarc

Re: [PATCH] Re: Lyx 1.5.X and gcc 4.3.0

2008-06-11 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Do I read correctly that we should apply the following patch to branch? Just go ahead if you think it's necessary. Jürgen

Re: [PATCH] Re: Lyx 1.5.X and gcc 4.3.0

2008-06-11 Thread Pavel Sanda
> I see that lyx::support::abort is not defined anymore, but that it is > still referenced in src/client/boost.cpp. What does this mean? nothing, its in comment ;) pavel