Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Ho no. Could it be that you have found the root of the existance of the
> little square? Damn!
Now _that_ is a HUGE regression. A minute of silence please. Thank you.
Alfredo
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 06:02:34PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > You use one wrong construct: "new InsetNewline()"
| > that should be: "new InsetNewline" (remvoe the parenthesis)
|
| I like the latter more, too, but I think in this case it is e
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 06:02:34PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> You use one wrong construct: "new InsetNewline()"
> that should be: "new InsetNewline" (remvoe the parenthesis)
I like the latter more, too, but I think in this case it is equivalent
(assuming that it compiles at all)
Andre'
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 05:31:49PM +, John Levon wrote:
|
| > Forget it, I can't get the patch to work at all anyway, it segfaults
| > looking for an inset at the end of a par that contains a newline. Lord
| > knows why.
|
| Heh, good one META_I
John Levon wrote:
> We have bogus getChar()s in a number of places. Can we at least start
> making some console noise for them ?
Ho no. Could it be that you have found the root of the existance of the
little square? Damn!
Alfredo
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 06:51:20PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | Heh, good one META_INSET is now == 0. Guess what we return on a
> | bogus getChar(pos) ...
>
> Move to 1?
I'm building that now.
john
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 05:31:49PM +, John Levon wrote:
|
| > Forget it, I can't get the patch to work at all anyway, it segfaults
| > looking for an inset at the end of a par that contains a newline. Lord
| > knows why.
|
| Heh, good one META_I
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 05:31:49PM +, John Levon wrote:
> Forget it, I can't get the patch to work at all anyway, it segfaults
> looking for an inset at the end of a par that contains a newline. Lord
> knows why.
Heh, good one META_INSET is now == 0. Guess what we return on a
bogus getC
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 05:21:13PM +, John Levon wrote:
> I did ??? Where ?
Forget it, I can't get the patch to work at all anyway, it segfaults
looking for an inset at the end of a par that contains a newline. Lord
knows why.
john
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 06:02:34PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Also it seems that you removed all backward comp wrt reading old
> files, if you do this, then lyx2lyx should be updated at the same
> time.
I did ??? Where ?
john
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Probably won't build but it's a sketch ... comments ?
|
| Note we could make it have a really big width but this would actually
| just complicated rowBreakPoint() and we'd *still* have to special case
| it anyway.
It removes a lot of lines good.
You use
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:39:04PM +, John Levon wrote:
>> > You can probably make InsetNewline::noFontChange() return true,
>> and > font setting will be closed and reopened later.
>>
>> OK
John> Actually I don't really understand
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 05:28:20PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> You can probably make InsetNewline::noFontChange() return true, and
>> font setting will be closed and reopened later.
John> OK
>> The test for style.newlin
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:39:04PM +, John Levon wrote:
> > You can probably make InsetNewline::noFontChange() return true, and
> > font setting will be closed and reopened later.
>
> OK
Actually I don't really understand all this TYPEWRITER_FAMILY stuff..
> john
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 05:28:20PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> You can probably make InsetNewline::noFontChange() return true, and
> font setting will be closed and reopened later.
OK
> The test for style.newline_allowed can probably be moved to the inset
> too.
Erm how ?
john
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Probably won't build but it's a sketch ... comments ?
John> Note we could make it have a really big width but this would
John> actually just complicated rowBreakPoint() and we'd *still* have
John> to special case it anyway.
Concerning
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:17:39PM +, John Levon wrote:
> Probably won't build but it's a sketch ... comments ?
I have not applied it, but that's certainly the right direction.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, eithe
17 matches
Mail list logo
