Re: [PATCH] In-place editing of macro arguments

2005-05-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 09:38:40PM +0200, Sebastian Reichelt wrote: > Hello JMarc! > > >From what I remember, the reason why Andre decided to handle math > >macros like that is because some macro arguments can appear more than > >once in a given macro, like \newcommand{\foo}[2]{#1+#2+#1}. Do you >

Re: [PATCH] In-place editing of macro arguments

2005-05-16 Thread Sebastian Reichelt
Hello JMarc! From what I remember, the reason why Andre decided to handle math macros like that is because some macro arguments can appear more than once in a given macro, like \newcommand{\foo}[2]{#1+#2+#1}. Do you handle this case? Yes, this case does not really need any special treatment. The on

Re: [PATCH] In-place editing of macro arguments

2005-05-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Reichelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sebastian> Hello! Right now, navigating macros with arguments is quite Sebastian> unintuitive, especially since they change their size on the Sebastian> screen when you enter and leave them. (Actually, I mean Sebastian> macro call