Re: [PATCH] Bug 3363: internal middle button paste does not mark buffer dirty.

2007-06-02 Thread Bo Peng
So we will be in company. :-) OK. Committed at r18632. Bo

Re: [PATCH] Bug 3363: internal middle button paste does not mark buffer dirty.

2007-06-02 Thread José Matos
On Saturday 02 June 2007 03:40:59 Bo Peng wrote: > Both emacs and gvim put cursor after pasted text. So we will be in company. :-) OK. > Bo -- José Abílio

Re: [PATCH] Bug 3363: internal middle button paste does not mark buffer dirty.

2007-06-02 Thread José Matos
On Friday 01 June 2007 22:27:47 Bo Peng wrote: > This patch partially fix bug 3363 by marking buffer dirty after > internal middle button paste. > > Seems easy enough. Jose? Yes. > Bo -- José Abílio

Re: [PATCH] Bug 3363: internal middle button paste does not mark buffer dirty.

2007-06-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bo> This patch partially fix bug 3363 by marking buffer dirty after Bo> internal middle button paste. Bo> Seems easy enough. Jose? Looks correct. JMarc

Re: [PATCH] Bug 3363: internal middle button paste does not mark buffer dirty.

2007-06-01 Thread Bo Peng
The latter is how middle button paste work in plain text but I prefer the former. Both emacs and gvim put cursor after pasted text. Bo

Re: [PATCH] Bug 3363: internal middle button paste does not mark buffer dirty.

2007-06-01 Thread Bo Peng
On 6/1/07, Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This patch partially fix bug 3363 by marking buffer dirty after internal middle button paste. Another half of the bug: cursor not set with middle button paste in InsetTabular. Index: src/insets/InsetTabular.cpp =