Bo Peng wrote:
I think the proper way to solve any option would have been to outsource
the option definitions in a text file which is easily upgradable.
But then 1.5.0 will not be usable for listings 2009... Adding a
backdoor is always safer. :-)
First strict validation, and then a work-around
On Monday 11 June 2007 15:26:01 Bo Peng wrote:
> This approach has been ditched. Another patch, which adds 'pass
> validation' check boxes, is proposed.
I only read this later and MUA does not have any function to recall sent
messages. ;-)
> Cheers,
> Bo
--
José Abílio
Just one note, could you document this behaviour somewhere (probably near the
listing documentation)? Else this will be equivalent to black magic. :-)
This approach has been ditched. Another patch, which adds 'pass
validation' check boxes, is proposed.
Cheers,
Bo
On Friday 08 June 2007 04:29:16 Bo Peng wrote:
> The validation mechanism of InsetListingsParams is great but is not
> flexible to handle unrecognized parameters introduced, e.g., by a new
> version of the listings.
>
> The attached patch allows users to input arbitrary parameters by
> prefixing it
I think the proper way to solve any option would have been to outsource
the option definitions in a text file which is easily upgradable.
But then 1.5.0 will not be usable for listings 2009... Adding a
backdoor is always safer. :-)
Bo
Bo Peng wrote:
I see no comment on this patch. Because this is within my field, I
will commit tomorrow if there is no objection.
No objection, so it is in.
I think the proper way to solve any option would have been to outsource
the option definitions in a text file which is easily upgradable
I see no comment on this patch. Because this is within my field, I
will commit tomorrow if there is no objection.
No objection, so it is in.
Cheers,
Bo
The attached patch allows users to input arbitrary parameters by
prefixing it with a '@' sign. @ will be removed in latex output, but
reserved in lyx files.
I see no comment on this patch. Because this is within my field, I
will commit tomorrow if there is no objection.
Cheers,
Bo
