Re: [PATCH] Adding convenience method to RandomAccessList

2006-03-29 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Comment? I think we should add them one by one as we make use of them. But rather than adding this (not that we should not add them at all), I think that a real iterator (randomaccess) class should be written for Ran

Re: [PATCH] Adding convenience method to RandomAccessList

2006-03-29 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Comment? I think we should add them one by one as we make use of them. But rather than adding this (not that we should not add them at all), I think that a real iterator (randomaccess) class should be written for RandomAccessList first. IMHO we sh

Re: [PATCH] Adding convenience method to RandomAccessList

2006-03-29 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 11:20:18AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Martin Vermeer a écrit : > >On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 22:18 +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > > >>Comment? > >> > > > >Looks good. > > > >Is this tested anywhere? > > > Not yet no. But the new erase methods should be straigh

Re: [PATCH] Adding convenience method to RandomAccessList

2006-03-29 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Martin Vermeer a écrit : On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 22:18 +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Comment? Looks good. Is this tested anywhere? Not yet no. But the new erase methods should be straight forward. I plan to test the splice methods with your outline work. Is it OK or do you want t

Re: [PATCH] Adding convenience method to RandomAccessList

2006-03-28 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 22:18 +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Comment? Looks good. Is this tested anywhere? - Martin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part