Re: [PATCH][RFC] Table selection

2001-12-07 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 09:34:13AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > OK, we still need the cursor position, but we don't ever need to show a cursor > > being there, and (for example) we don't need to go to the dummy position when > > unlocking the insettext. Why ? because clicking onto the dummy se

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Table selection

2001-12-07 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 06-Dec-2001 John Levon wrote: > OK, we still need the cursor position, but we don't ever need to show a cursor > being there, and (for example) we don't need to go to the dummy position when > unlocking the insettext. Why ? because clicking onto the dummy selects the cell, > and from then on

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Table selection

2001-12-06 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:10:37AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: > I would say this is a feature not a bug, otherwise how would you select > exactly the columns which are selected. Well we are inconsistent you'll > say because if I do the other way round when entering the multi-cell it is > selecte

RE: [PATCH][RFC] Table selection

2001-12-06 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 06-Dec-2001 John Levon wrote: > > first, the bugs I noticed in both old and new code : > > 1) attached file : selection the multicolumn cell, then press up. the topright > cell is not selected. I would say this is a feature not a bug, otherwise how would you select exactly the columns which