Am 30.05.2013 19:36, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Why is that exotic? Tibetan is a language as others or do we decide how
important a language is?
If so than we should not provide support for example for Estonian.
I mean exotic in the sense that the number of users that are writing Tibetan
Op 30-5-2013 18:54, Uwe Stöhr schreef:
Am 29.05.2013 10:14, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
+2013-05-28 Uwe Stöhr
+* Format incremented to 473: support to set Tibetan as document
language
This is not the time to start pushing all kinds of exotic last-minute
file format changes.
Why
Am 29.05.2013 10:14, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
+2013-05-28 Uwe Stöhr
+* Format incremented to 473: support to set Tibetan as document language
This is not the time to start pushing all kinds of exotic last-minute file
format changes.
Why is that exotic? Tibetan is a language as
Op 28-5-2013 23:40, Uwe Stöhr schreef:
The branch, master, has been updated.
- Log -
commit ea2d5947e976964e91bc691ea2a4fe03ccf83d2a
Author: Uwe Stöhr
Date: Tue May 28 23:40:17 2013 +0200
support to set Tibetan as documen
