Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Should this kind of thing --- which is purely "under the hood" --- be
> documented in status.16x, or no need? (reminder: code reuse in overloaded
> versions of isRTLBoundary)
I don't think this specific change needs to be documented.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Jürgen, OK for branch?
OK.
Jürgen
Should this kind of thing --- which is purely "under the hood" --- be documented
in status.16x, or no need? (reminder: code reuse in overloaded versions of
isRTLBoundary)
Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Jürgen, OK for branch?
OK.
Jürgen
