Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> >> What was our policy in the past (i.e., your policy)? Personally, I
> >> would be fine with this.
> >
> > I think I would have accepted the new template. Concerns about new
> > layouts/templates being a fileformat change have always be
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> What was our policy in the past (i.e., your policy)? Personally, I
>> would be fine with this.
>
> I think I would have accepted the new template. Concerns about new
> layouts/templates being a fileformat change have always been theoretical
> AFAICR, so there has be
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> What was our policy in the past (i.e., your policy)? Personally, I
> would be fine with this.
I think I would have accepted the new template. Concerns about new
layouts/templates being a fileformat change have always been theoretical
AFAICR, so there has been no reaso
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> As you say it is the same as new layouts. One argument is that users of
> older lyx version can get hold of the updated external templates and
> they will work in their new version. If it turned out to be a real-life
> problem, we could host a page with all these modi
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> > Allow Dia diagrams as external insets.
>>
>> what about the branch?
>
> I think our policy was to not introduce new External insets in branch, since
> this is de facto a file format change, but I'm not absolutely sure (since the
> same would a
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Allow Dia diagrams as external insets.
>
> what about the branch?
I think our policy was to not introduce new External insets in branch, since
this is de facto a file format change, but I'm not absolutely sure (since the
same would apply to new layouts and modules).
What
sa...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: sanda
> Date: Tue Dec 16 17:07:07 2008
> New Revision: 27899
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/27899
> Log:
> Allow Dia diagrams as external insets.
what about the branch?
pavel
