On 29/09/2008 12:49, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The only difference is that I preserve the efficiency ;-)
And that you have one of these useless and confusing mutable objects.
What about this?
That's good.
Abdel.
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The only difference is that I preserve the efficiency ;-)
And that you have one of these useless and confusing mutable objects.
What about this?
JMarc
svndiff src/frontends/qt4/GuiParagraph.cpp src/frontends/qt4/GuiParagraph.h
Index: src/frontend
On 29/09/2008 12:31, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hum, I already did that :-)
And it seems that the patches are almost equivalent...
The only difference is that I preserve the efficiency ;-)
Abdel.
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hum, I already did that :-)
And it seems that the patches are almost equivalent...
JMarc
On 29/09/2008 12:22, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
That is not a question of smartness but of efficiency. At the time I
didn't want to trigger to make a full copy of the current parameter
set each cursor move. That was not to avoid the dispatch of
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hum... in decoded abdel mode that means: At the time I didn't want to
> make a full copy of the current parameter set for each cursor move.
I understood that :) But I doubt that this copy is expensive.
JMarc
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That is not a question of smartness but of efficiency. At the time I
> didn't want to trigger to make a full copy of the current parameter
> set each cursor move. That was not to avoid the dispatch of an LFUN
> which can still be done easily with curr
On 29/09/2008 11:59, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 29/09/2008 10:53, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This is typically a consequence of code that tries to be smart: directly
access param at point when we do not have a selection, and avoid to
dispatch an lfun.
That is not a question of smartness but
On 29/09/2008 10:53, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fix bug http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5285 .
--- lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/GuiParagraph.cpp (original)
+++ lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/GuiParagraph.cpp Fri Sep 26 23:34:08 2008
@@ -338,6 +338,7
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think this chage should be reverted and GuiParagraph should be changed
>> to work through LyXFunc.
> Is that a question or a request to do it? If the former: I agree, if
> the later, not in the immediate future :-)
It is mainly a request to think
On 29/09/2008 10:53, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fix bug http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5285 .
--- lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/GuiParagraph.cpp (original)
+++ lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/GuiParagraph.cpp Fri Sep 26 23:34:08 2008
@@ -338,6 +338,7
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Fix bug http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5285 .
> --- lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/GuiParagraph.cpp (original)
> +++ lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/GuiParagraph.cpp Fri Sep 26 23:34:08
> 2008
> @@ -338,6 +338,7 @@
>
> bufferview()->updateMetrics()
12 matches
Mail list logo
