On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 12:12:49PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Author: poenitz
> > Date: Tue Nov 6 22:45:24 2007
> > New Revision: 21482
> >
> > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/21482
> > Log:
> > we assume (more or less) conforming compilers nowaday
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I don't think we should test for that anyway as I remember using
istream and ostream with gcc2.7 more than 10 years ago ;-)
Yes, but they did not have the same interface, did they?
I think they did. What was changing
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think we should test for that anyway as I remember using
> istream and ostream with gcc2.7 more than 10 years ago ;-)
Yes, but they did not have the same interface, did they?
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Author: poenitz
Date: Tue Nov 6 22:45:24 2007
New Revision: 21482
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/21482
Log:
we assume (more or less) conforming compilers nowadays.
And do we test for that? We should.
Well, we require the availa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Author: poenitz
> Date: Tue Nov 6 22:45:24 2007
> New Revision: 21482
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/21482
> Log:
> we assume (more or less) conforming compilers nowadays.
And do we test for that? We should.
JMarc
