John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Advanced" tabs are always a mistake.
>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216931
+1
But you have not been very successful wrt firefox :)
JMarc
Uwe Stöhr schrieb:
> Question: Is it really desirable to change dialogs which each major
release? Why can't we get them > right at the very first time?
In this case where the dialog now has 4 options, not 2 as before - Yes.
Good point :-)
In general, in my opinion, many dialogs should be revis
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 08:38:27AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >it is obvious that if the user doesn't check those boxes the parameters
> >won't be set. and as i wrote, if we would do this we will deviate from
> >what we are doing in the rest of lyx.
>
> Maybe Uwe thinks of them as "Advan
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Thant's what I do. As result of the grid layout, I get some red borders
in the designer. In you layout I don't get them.
what you do, is you select some widgets and then layout in grid
i don't select any widgets, i just click on the base/parent widget and
then do layout in gr
Edwin Leuven schrieb:
- Why do the dialogs look fine on my system and not on yours?
didn't look at it closely, but i think that you put a lot of stuff in
hboxlayouts and then widgets won't always align nicely in a grid. to
achieve this best to position the widgets and them put them in a grid
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
- Why do the dialogs look fine on my system and not on yours?
didn't look at it closely, but i think that you put a lot of stuff in
hboxlayouts and then widgets won't always align nicely in a grid. to
achieve this best to position the widgets and them put
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> So why not directly stating that
> an optional parameter is optional?
I agree with Edwin here. We shouldn't do that. The fact that something can
be selected or not indicates clearly enough that it's optional.
Jürgen
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
- Why do the dialogs look fine on my system and not on yours?
didn't look at it closely, but i think that you put a lot of stuff in
hboxlayouts and then widgets won't always align nicely in a grid. to
achieve this best to position the widgets and them put them in a grid layou
Hello Edwin,
I was really talking bullshit yesterday. I need to test things out properly the next time before
raising my voice. I was angry because nothing was working after I updated SVN. In the end your
cleanup was absolutely correct and my further Ui-changes I had im my tree were pointing to
Edwin Leuven schrieb:
the behavior of the dialog hasn't changed. the overhang and linespan are
still optional. if they are not checked they are not passed on. i didn't
touch this part of the code.
if you think that changing a label (ie removing the "optional") changes
the behavior of the dialo
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
No, this is not the way it works! I implemented that we now use the
wrapfig-package for wrap floats. We can therefore provide two new
parameters. These are optional and after a discussion on the list
(see the one about my Box-patch some days ago) and in bug 3242 I
implemented t
> Uwe, you have to understand that when something works on windows
> (or for you) it doesn't mean that it works everywhere (or for others).
> The layout was broken on solaris (wrap-bad.png) and Edwin corrected
> that (wrap-ok.png).
This is not what I meant. Edwin reverted the checkboxes and their
Leuven, E. schrieb:
what is destroyed?
> Please revert! (Or I'll do.)
the dialog layout was very messy, so please tell me what is wrong atm so
that i can address it...
No, this is not the way it works! I implemented that we now use the wrapfig-package for wrap floats.
We can therefore pro
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 12:31:32PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/20727
>
> Eh, what are you doing? You destroyed the complete dialog.
> We discussed this before I committed this. Please revert! (Or I'll do.)
Uwe, you have to understand that when something works on
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Eh, what are you doing? You destroyed the complete dialog.
> We discussed this before I committed this.
what is destroyed?
> Please revert! (Or I'll do.)
the dialog layout was very messy, so please tell me what is wrong atm so that i
can address it...
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/20727
Eh, what are you doing? You destroyed the complete dialog.
We discussed this before I committed this. Please revert! (Or I'll do.)
Uwe
Michael Gerz wrote:
Question: Is it really desirable to change dialogs which each major
release?
your question suggests that changing them is a goal in itself.
but yes, it is desirable to improve lyx's dialogs and make them more
uniform...
Why can't we get them right at the very first time
> Question: Is it really desirable to change dialogs which each major release? Why can't we get
them > right at the very first time?
In this case where the dialog now has 4 options, not 2 as before - Yes.
In general, in my opinion, many dialogs should be revised. Take for example the
table dia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Author: uwestoehr
Date: Wed Oct 3 11:56:28 2007
New Revision: 20690
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/20690
Log:
WrapUi.ui: better dialog layout
This seems to be the n-th dialog whose layout changed for the 1.6
series. There were also a couple of dialogs tha
19 matches
Mail list logo
