> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: BTW we really should support
Jürgen> \slash. It's in the LaTeX kernel, and it's really useful.
>> Indeed.
Jürgen> Too late for 1.5? It's a trivial change, but a file format
Jürgen> change neverth
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Jürgen> BTW we really should support \slash. It's in the LaTeX kernel,
> Jürgen> and it's really useful.
>
> Indeed.
Too late for 1.5? It's a trivial change, but a file format change
nevertheless.
Jürgen
> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Actually, I cited the wrong command ("" is for a possible line
>> break without hyphenation).
Jürgen> BTW we really should support \slash. It's in the LaTeX kernel,
Jürgen> and it's really useful
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Actually, I cited the wrong command ("" is for a possible line break
> without hyphenation).
BTW we really should support \slash. It's in the LaTeX kernel, and it's really
useful.
Jürgen
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Jürgen> But we are talking only about verbatim << and >> only here. I
> Jürgen> don't see why this could happen.
>
> I am not sure what you mean here. And example (I think) is what the
> text in question is inside a section heading.
I mean that the code we are talking
> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> Actually, I cited the wrong command ("" is for a possible line
Jürgen> break without hyphenation). This is the correct one:
Jürgen> [EMAIL PROTECTED]"|}{%
Jürgen> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jürgen> \allowhyphens}{}}
Jürgen> Compared
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Jürgen> The corresponding shortcut for disabling ligatures? Its
> Jürgen> [EMAIL PROTECTED]""[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Jürgen> while \textcompwordmark is:
> Jürgen> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> OK, so it is almost the same.
Actually, I cited the wrong command ("" is for a possib
> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> What is the corresponfing shortcut in babel/german? I'd like to see
>> how it is implemented.
Jürgen> The corresponding shortcut for disabling ligatures? Its
Jürgen> [EMAIL PROTECTED]""[EMAIL P
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What is the corresponfing shortcut in babel/german? I'd like to see
> how it is implemented.
The corresponding shortcut for disabling ligatures? Its
[EMAIL PROTECTED]""[EMAIL PROTECTED]
while \textcompwordmark is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For the case in question, however,
> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> The question here is whether \, is really equivalent to
>> \textcompwordmark.
Jürgen> It's definitely not equivalent. IMO, the code in question is
Jürgen> plain wrong.
What is the corresponfin
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So the advantage of \, is to produce shorter code, but the output is
> different and contains more spacing.
>
> I would be interested to hear german writers' thought on that issue.
I have no idea. I only saw that the counting was wrong, and corrected that.
I use LyX
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> The question here is whether \, is really equivalent to
> \textcompwordmark.
It's definitely not equivalent. IMO, the code in question is plain wrong.
Jürgen
> "baum" == baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
baum> Author: baum Date: Sat Jan 20 18:21:52 2007 New Revision: 16785
baum> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16785 Log: count
baum> correctly
The question here is whether \, is really equivalent to
\textcompwordmark. The definitions are:
Michael Gerz wrote:
> Sure?
Yes!
> Looks like 4.
1 is always added somewhere else (this is the common case).
Georg
Sure? Looks like 4.
Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Author: baum
Date: Sat Jan 20 18:21:52 2007
New Revision: 16785
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16785
Log:
count correctly
Modified:
lyx-devel/trunk/src/paragraph_pimpl.C
Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/paragraph_pimpl.C
URL:
15 matches
Mail list logo
