Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
* Close All / Close View
Close all should close all visible workareas and the
buffers that were hidden in this view. Again, I wouldn't
close buffers in another view.
There is no such thing as "buffers that were hidden in this view".
Yes, that
>> * Close
>>
>> When you close a buffer in one view, it's everything but
>> expected thatthis buffer gets closed in the other view
>> too. I know this is 'consistent', but I'd rather stop
>> doing that.
>
> I disagree but I guess this is just a terminology problem.
> We should rename that to
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
but its maybe true that some people would like
see 'hide all' in menu...
No, I was thinking about "Close All" == "Close All Buffers in this
View"
if we call it 'close all in window', then it would ok with me.
(hide all would be consi
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> IMHO: I don't want to be consistent anymore, because I feel that the
> current situation is very misleading and unintuitive.
>
> * Close Tab Group
>
> This should maybe be Close Split View, and it shouldn't hide the
> documents which were in the tabgroup, bec
>>
>> >but its maybe true that some people would like
>> see 'hide all' in menu...
>>
>> No, I was thinking about "Close All" == "Close All Buffers in this
View"
>
>if we call it 'close all in window', then it would ok with me.
>(hide all would be consistent though, but i have no hard opinion.)
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>
> >but its maybe true that some people would like see 'hide all' in
> menu...
>
> No, I was thinking about "Close All" == "Close All Buffers in this View"
if we call it 'close all in window', then it would ok with me. (hide all
would be consistent though, bu
> pavel
I mean,
Vincent
>but its maybe true that some people would like see 'hide all' in
menu...
No, I was thinking about "Close All" == "Close All Buffers in this View"
pavel
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>
> >> So, when we close a view, we shouldn't release all buffers, but when
> >> we choose File->Close All, then we should ?
> >
> >close even hidden ones imho
>
> So, if I choose File->Close All in one view, it'll close all
> workareas/buffers in all views.
>> So, when we close a view, we shouldn't release all buffers, but when
>> we choose File->Close All, then we should ?
>
>close even hidden ones imho
So, if I choose File->Close All in one view, it'll close all
workareas/buffers in all views. That's not as expected I guess, or is it
?
>pavel
On 08/18/2009 04:36 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef:
I'm a little unclear on how separate views are supposed to work. So,
maybe a silly question, but: When we call this, do we really want to
close ALL open buffers? Can there be more than one GuiView at a
ti
On 08/18/2009 04:33 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Thanks for checking.
Never a problem.
rh
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Now, I think about it. It was Pavel who thought it was strange that the
> hidden buffers were still loaded, while he was talking about multiple
> views.
iirc this was about master/child relation and not multiple view.
> So, when we close a view, we shouldn't rele
Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef:
I'm a little unclear on how separate views are supposed to work. So,
maybe a silly question, but: When we call this, do we really want to
close ALL open buffers? Can there be more than one GuiView at a time?
You see the worry.
Ah yes, you're right... I'm bei
I'm a little unclear on how separate views are supposed to work. So,
maybe a silly question, but: When we call this, do we really want to
close ALL open buffers? Can there be more than one GuiView at a time?
You see the worry.
Ah yes, you're right... I'm being too enthusiastic.
+
+bool G
On 08/18/2009 04:12 PM, v...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: vfr
Date: Tue Aug 18 22:12:34 2009
New Revision: 31125
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31125
Log:
Rename closeBufferAll to closeWorkAreaAll (because that's what we do). Add a
new closeBufferAll function that closes all WorkArea's and th
16 matches
Mail list logo
