On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 03-Oct-2000 John Levon wrote:
> >
> > are you thinking of adding a Makefile rule ? I can do this in my
> > pending updates if you want - I have sorted the Makefile into alphabetical
> > order for tidiness anyway
> >
>
> I was thinking about a make
On 03-Oct-2000 John Levon wrote:
>
> are you thinking of adding a Makefile rule ? I can do this in my
> pending updates if you want - I have sorted the Makefile into alphabetical
> order for tidiness anyway
>
I was thinking about a makefile in the dlg directory to regenerate the
sources autom
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Good! I'll have a look for the -g option
>
> Jürgen
are you thinking of adding a Makefile rule ? I can do this in my
pending updates if you want - I have sorted the Makefile into alphabetical
order for tidiness anyway
Also Juergen I was thinki
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 02-Oct-2000 John Levon wrote:
> >
> > After speaking with Jeff Harris, he has agreed in principle
> > to accept a patch if it is optional properly.
> >
> > And he pointed me to -g option, which is the filter thing you were asking
> > for Juergen
On 02-Oct-2000 John Levon wrote:
>
> After speaking with Jeff Harris, he has agreed in principle
> to accept a patch if it is optional properly.
>
> And he pointed me to -g option, which is the filter thing you were asking
> for Juergen ;)
Good! I'll have a look for the -g option and also for
