"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Well, it compiles now, but I had two minipages in a row, 67% and 33%.
| The first one was gone. The second did not end in the correct place, but
| include subsequent .eps files. I cut those out and pasted them after the
| minipage.
| Text in the 33%
Well, it compiles now, but I had two minipages in a row, 67% and 33%.
The first one was gone. The second did not end in the correct place, but
include subsequent .eps files. I cut those out and pasted them after the
minipage.
Text in the 33% minipage wrapped earlier than it used to.
I could not fi
Juergen Vigna wrote:
> I'll fix this now (or try to) then please Garst have a look with your
> files and tell me if there are still differences in the produced code!
>
> Jürgen
I'll be happy to as soon as I can get it to compile.
gcc-3.0 log attached.
Garst
Making all in controllers
mak
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 22-Mar-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Dumb question: why should we have handling for paragraph and hfill
>> in minipages? Since this can be handled directly by LyX, shoudn't
>> we remove such features now (and convert g
On 22-Mar-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Dumb question: why should we have handling for paragraph and hfill in
> minipages? Since this can be handled directly by LyX, shoudn't we
> remove such features now (and convert gracefully old files, of
> course)?
We are talking about reading old fil
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen>* The first of a series of minipages should be in it's own
Juergen> paragraph Lars did this but he also regarded the "Hfill"
Juergen> flag! In the old output routine this "Hfill" flag was not
Juergen> regarded, or if it was
Some more notes on this:
1. I've seen that Lars was busy and implemented the stuff where I only put
#warnings (very good work Lars!)
2. I fixed a small bug in the LaTeX production code where only withp_ was
outputed but not width_ (if not empty).
3. We have still some missbehaviours in t
On 22-Mar-2001 Garst R. Reese wrote:
> I notice that they are still not working. Is this still a known problem
> or should I send a more complete report?
No you're right some parameters is not taken into account when outputting the
LaTeX code. I'll have a look at this today!
Jürgen
--
-.
