Re: mathed94.diff

2001-07-06 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 06-Jul-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >| You still duplicate the code for open_new_inset! I would say if you REALLY >| insist in this global functions (but I would prefer not) then it's better >| we make open_new_inset public available in BufferView_pimpl.[Ch] and you >| use that one in the

Re: mathed94.diff

2001-07-06 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 05-Jul-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote: | > | > Last shot. | | Well I really hope not! | | > Seperate mathed functions for every LFUN_MATH*. | | Is this really needed/wanted? yes. | > No change to BufferView*.* | | Well let's say no change in Buffer

Re: mathed94.diff

2001-07-06 Thread Andre Poenitz
> > Last shot. > > Well I really hope not! It was meant seriously. I think 94 complies with all requests reasonably well. > > Seperate mathed functions for every LFUN_MATH*. > > Is this really needed/wanted? That's what Lars requested. > > No change to BufferView*.* > > Well let's say no

RE: mathed94.diff

2001-07-06 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 05-Jul-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Last shot. Well I really hope not! > Seperate mathed functions for every LFUN_MATH*. Is this really needed/wanted? > No change to BufferView*.* Well let's say no change in BufferView*.h You still duplicate the code for open_new_inset! I would say if