On 18 January 2017 at 01:21, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:54:02PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anyone have a list of the build dependencies that need to be
> installed
> > in order to build the latest LyX on a clean Ubuntu 16.04 using Qt5?
> I.e.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:54:02PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone have a list of the build dependencies that need to be installed
> in order to build the latest LyX on a clean Ubuntu 16.04 using Qt5? I.e.,
> I'm looking for the
>
>sudo apt-get install build-essenti
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi,
|
| By moving configure.in/ac into the config directory, the dependency on it has broken.
| When config/configure.[in,ac] is updated in CVS, a make won't rerun anything to
|produce
| a new configure script.
|
| Is it difficult/worthwhile to add the
On Thursday 18 July 2002 11:25 am, you wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 10:38:57AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > moz frontends 195 touch LyXView.h
> > > moz frontends 196 make LyXView.o
> > > make: `LyXView.o' is up to date.
> >
> > Your build and src dir are different and so you've just creat
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 10:38:57AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > moz frontends 195 touch LyXView.h
> > moz frontends 196 make LyXView.o
> > make: `LyXView.o' is up to date.
>
> Your build and src dir are different and so you've just created an empty
> LyXView.h in the build dir, not seen by M
On Thursday 18 July 2002 10:53 am, John Levon wrote:
> moz frontends 195 touch LyXView.h
> moz frontends 196 make LyXView.o
> make: `LyXView.o' is up to date.
>
> ideas ?
Your build and src dir are different and so you've just created an empty
LyXView.h in the build dir, not seen by Makefile?
A
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 01:44:16PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
>
> Aehm... could it be that these are other dependency for other files?
>
> Not that it would make much sense to include such a lot of empty
> dependencies, but it should be legal.
... and they are produced by the tr/sed combo in
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:20:41AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > You mean the lines ending in a colon?
> >
> > I've got them, too. But I don't even know how lyx produces its
> > dependencies...
>
> Me neither, although I believe that it makes use of "${CXX} -E".
> Anyway, at lesst this means th
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:20:41AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Me neither, although I believe that it makes use of "${CXX} -E".
That's just preprocessing... I usually use -MM but that's a GNUism ...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor d
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 11:01 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 10:18:01AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > My dependencies seem to have gone mad! Why are all these controllers
> > ControlBibitem.lo: ../../../../devel/src/insets/insetbutton.h
> > ../../../../devel/src/insets/insetf
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 10:18:01AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> My dependencies seem to have gone mad! Why are all these controllers
> ControlBibitem.lo: ../../../../devel/src/insets/insetbutton.h
> ../../../../devel/src/insets/insetfloat.h:
You mean the lines ending in a colon?
I've got them,
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 02:43:04PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> [make in src/ works to rebuilt the binary if any .C file is
> Andre> changend in src/mathed]
>
> Is your problem fixed now?
Don't know... I decided not to look too hard at src/inset...
Andre'
--
André Pönitz ..
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 03:32:35PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> [make in src/ works to rebuilt the binary if any .C file is
> Andre> changend in src/mathed]
>
> Is that new? Which version of autoconf/automake do you have? Did you
> run ./autogen.sh?
Uuh... not manually recently...
On 18-Oct-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> No, not really... as I said, it works in src/mathed... maybe a problem with
> timestamps...I'll have a look again.
Please pay attention that if you work on a nfs file system the files are
written with the date/time of the nfs-server machine. Such things hap
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 01:04:08PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Here this works as expected, changing a source file recompiles that file!
> Maybe you're working on a special filesystem?
No, not really... as I said, it works in src/mathed... maybe a problem with
timestamps...I'll have a look agai
On 18-Oct-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> When I change inset/insettabulars.C and type 'make' (either in src or in
> src/insets) nothing happens. Looks like I have to remove the .lo file
> manually?
>
> Is this intended?
Here this works as expected, changing a source file recompiles that file!
16 matches
Mail list logo
